Writing Machines Notebook
Revision as of 15:09, 15 October 2025 by LEa (talk | contribs) (→Georges Perec: The Art of Asking your Boss for a Raise (org.: L'art et la manière d'aborder son chef de service pour lui demander une augmentation))
Annotations, sketches, shards, snippets, marginalia
Please use headers and edit subsections only to avoid parallel edit problems :)
Uncreative Writing: Bart's Note
Date: 17/09/2025
Reading group: Bart - Ema - Robin - Tommi - Youjung
Protocol: We took turns reading pieces of the physical book out loud. While one person is reading, the others will take notes in a digital copy of the text.
Pad: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/UncreativeWriting_Notes
Notes:
Another subheader :)
Methods 2025-10-01: Group Discussions Of Texts That Had Been Read
Georges Perec: The Art of Asking your Boss for a Raise (org.: L'art et la manière d'aborder son chef de service pour lui demander une augmentation)
- There are different versions of this work: a diagram, a text, a radio broadcast > we mostly engaged with the text and/or the diagram.
- The experiences of “reading” the flow chart and the text are very different:
- The concept of the diagram is a loop; a text is always linear.
- The diagram is the script of a computer program, the text is the entire iteration.
- The written text is prefaced with an intro by the translator, which gives helpful context.
- The text is not punctuated and only in lower case. This is probably meant to simulate a computer algorithm and mechanical processes, but it also resembles the stream of consciousness of a human. The lack of punctuation makes the text uncomfortable to read, it is easy to get lost in in it—but also entertaining.
- The subject (“you”) never actually asks for a raise. A possible interpretation: Perec is trying to critique hierarchy of companies.
- from the intro: there’s an “exhilarating potential of repetitiveness and recursion”
- “decide to try your luck afresh tomorrow”
- “circumperambulate”: to walk/wander without a destiny in circles (webster: to circle on foot especially ritualistically); in portuguese perambular means to wander
Marcel Bénabou: Rule and Constraint (org.: La règle et la contrainte)
- Rule is a metric or a form while a constraint is a generative result
- Benabou argues in favour of constraint and points out to both strict and freedom-based literary schools of thought, as if they were missing the whole point of language: which is to be treated as an object in itself, not a mere conveyor of information.
- Some forms of constraint are accepted/desired: poetic forms like an alexandrine or a sonnet (also, haiku or limerick) have specific rhyme schemes, or a set number of syllables or lines
- Constraints does not confine the authors but liberates them, you escape from your own censorship.
- Constraints can enhance your creativity by limiting your toolset. Rules are for comprehension, constraints are for cerativity.
- Language is something material, i think about the container(like a book, laptop) but language & rules itself have a material, what differentiates grammar and crazy writing machines
- "Each page is a bed where letters lie"
- "Constraint forces the system out of its routine functioning, thereby compelling it to reveal its hidden resources"
- "Constraint goes beyond rules, people who have questioned language can escape the system and reveal hidden resources" – maybe a reason why someone starts to learn coding to understand the constraints
Raymond Queneau: A Story as You Like It
- Interesting to put this into the context of the time when it was created, modern day the stories are very complex but might have been interesting back in the days.
- All of the choices that you get at the end is very opinionated, everything is a opinion which is quite different from asking your boss for a raise. In this, reader casts a judgement to the choice and story.
Paul Fournel: The Theater Tree — A Combinatory Play
- Example for different ways of writing scripts/texts (like a "choose your own adventure games")
- Black mirror: pretended that the way the story was made is revelutionary, but actually it was not! Fournels ideas at the time also not revolutionary
- Similiar structure to Italo Calvino's books
Michael Winkler: Where Signs Resemble Thoughts
- Michael Winkler: both an author and an artist
- Llanguage is a code (we all came up with it and agreed on it)
- The point of a code: someone else has to be able to understand
- Winkler made symbols out of words by connecting the letters within a circle (there are other possible codes!)
- Connecting the words with the symblos, it's possible to reflect on the word itself > serendipity
- Interesting exercise to take language (and words) apart and look at the single components
- Ideographic: (greek: ideo = that is seen; gramma: letter / written sign)
- Other writing systems are (more) symbolic in themselves
> with e.g. Chinese a system like winkler's would be way more compilcated
> sign for "fire" looks like a bonfire, for "person" looks like a stick figure - Visually resembles the connection between stars (as in astrology)
- Language as a code is underlying computing, but the codes in computing are very inaccessible to people using other writing systems
- Xu Bing !