((in)ter)dependence/Communities of Practise
Revision as of 15:48, 31 January 2024 by Thijshijsijsjss (talk | contribs) (Fix Leigh Star text publishing date)
Appears Misplaced Concretism and Concrete Situations: Feminism, Method, and Information Technology (Susan Leigh Star, 1994, find it here on the bootleg library), that builds on the concept from Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation (Lave and Wenger, 1992).
A community of practise...
... is composed of people and things,
themselves in ecological relation,
with numbers of representations
and signals, and ways of working
... as a term emphasizes the ways in which people work together and act together to form communities
... is a way of talking about a linked web of actions, people, and artifacts
Objects in a community of practise...
... come to be only in the context and action and use
... exhibit a level of familiarity, 'taken-for-grantedness'
... are on a trajectory of naturalization
-- the removal of contingencies of an object's creation and its situated nature
-- that has elements of ambiguity and duration
-> it is not predetermined an object wil ever become naturalized or how long it will remain so
People in a community of practise...
... are considered 'newcomer'
not through their relation with other people in the community
but through their relation with the objects in the community
... are on a trajectory of membership
(which ranges from illegitimate peripheral participation
to full membership)
that consists of a series of encounters with the objects in the community
and increasingly being in a naturalized relationship with them