User:Queenfeline/catch a brainstorm: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 114: Line 114:
'''Feedback'''
'''Feedback'''
:: Where am I standing? Who am I speaking to? Find my voice, put my feed on the ground (or acknowledge that they are already somewhere on a ground) and speak with my voice! Pin-pointing more.  
:: Where am I standing? Who am I speaking to? Find my voice, put my feed on the ground (or acknowledge that they are already somewhere on a ground) and speak with my voice! Pin-pointing more.  
::::But why do i feel like im not qualified enough to speak on topics? Im a privileged, white woman. There are people who are way more qualified to speak about feminism and stuff like that. No one needs another white girl, who thinks she knows better....
 


</br>
</br>
<div style="width:800px;background-color:LemonChiffon;padding:1em;>
<span style="font-size:20pt;">To < p > or not to < p ></span>
<span style="font-size:20pt;">To < p > or not to < p ></span>
::to declare something dead is must've been alive first.
::to declare something dead is must've been alive first.
::So if we say a link is dead, was it alive before? When was is born?
::when we say a link is "dead", we're using a metaphor that implies the link once had life — it functioned, led somewhere, served a purpose. This language hints at a deeper intuition many people share: that the web feels alive in some way. Not in a biological sense, of course but there is a lot of organismic terms when it comes to the web – it grows, decays, evolves, gets "sick" (with malware), and even dies in parts (dead links, defunct sites). So while the web isn't alive like humans, it behaves in ways that resemble life: changing, reacting, replicating.
 
::Digital decay – digital memory
 
::'''Digital Memory and the Archive''' – Wolfgang Ernst (2012) – A more philosophical, media-archaeological look at how digital systems remember and forget, including how data "lives" and "dies."
::'''Zombie Media''' – Garnet Hertz & Jussi Parikka (2012) – A media art theory essay about technologies that won’t die—obsolete but lingering in digital ecosystems. Parallels ideas of digital haunting and undead links.
 
 
 
</div>

Revision as of 12:11, 30 April 2025

So yeahhhh here we are.

i will do my master.

this will happen.

so here are ideas

i guess


Cheesymotivation.jpg

"Catch a brainstorm"

–How do we consider practise, not just product?

– Philosophie und grafische Experimente

– Website: philosophische fragen auf die man antworten kann mit grafischen formen ?!

Music as a language

– What (even) is language?

– What is in it that we think we understand?

– What does it even mean to understand?

– What are the objects of understanding, what is there to understand?

– notation = language?

– if so, what are we reading and understanding in that?


"Voice is a medium for collective practise"– Let's talk about unspeakable things

Words shape our world.

Language can also change our world – feminist language (go read glossary of undisciplined design!)


– tattoo flipbook weiterarbeiten?

– generell: Wie können grafische elemente (per zufall) entstehen?

collective – collaborative


read as many books as possible!!!

As CSS works with language – how is it similar to poetry?

– find books about coding as language

A definition of definition

– alsways come up with new ways to describe/define the words to define the defined

"To fall quickly and in large amounts"cascading

Zine – Wörter als Grafiken/Grafen


Annotation zine

– layout all the pages round a table

– give everyone a pencil and let them annotate every page

Notes01.png

Keyboard Zine

– write the same thing on different language keyboards and note the positions grafically

Websites

– with js i guess... when type a random character it takes it and displays it a random number of times and with random fontsizes (and fonts?)

– type a caracter this displays a form in a randomized size on a randomized place on the viewport, different keys do different forms – maus hinterlässt eine spur

– poem generator... take the email subjects?! and then make 4 or 5 lines - with filling words?

RE: Poetry


what happens to the web, if the content gets analog and then back into the web?


– Fragmentation

– pinplotting on the special paper a zine?

– Verschiedene Arten von Zeiterfassung/-darstellung hier


Why and how do we feel connected through the internet?
human interaction – the www as a tool for (feminist) connection

Feedback

Where am I standing? Who am I speaking to? Find my voice, put my feed on the ground (or acknowledge that they are already somewhere on a ground) and speak with my voice! Pin-pointing more.



To < p > or not to < p >

to declare something dead is must've been alive first.
when we say a link is "dead", we're using a metaphor that implies the link once had life — it functioned, led somewhere, served a purpose. This language hints at a deeper intuition many people share: that the web feels alive in some way. Not in a biological sense, of course but there is a lot of organismic terms when it comes to the web – it grows, decays, evolves, gets "sick" (with malware), and even dies in parts (dead links, defunct sites). So while the web isn't alive like humans, it behaves in ways that resemble life: changing, reacting, replicating.
Digital decay – digital memory
Digital Memory and the Archive – Wolfgang Ernst (2012) – A more philosophical, media-archaeological look at how digital systems remember and forget, including how data "lives" and "dies."
Zombie Media – Garnet Hertz & Jussi Parikka (2012) – A media art theory essay about technologies that won’t die—obsolete but lingering in digital ecosystems. Parallels ideas of digital haunting and undead links.