Writing Machines Notebook: Difference between revisions
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
===Georges Perec: The Art of Asking your Boss for a Raise (org.: L'art et la manière d'aborder son chef de service pour lui demander une augmentation)=== | ===Georges Perec: The Art of Asking your Boss for a Raise (org.: L'art et la manière d'aborder son chef de service pour lui demander une augmentation)=== | ||
* There are different versions of this work: a '''diagram''', a '''text''', a '''radio broadcast''' > we mostly engaged with the text and/or the diagram. | |||
* The experiences of “reading” the flow chart and the text are very different: | |||
** The concept of the diagram is a '''loop'''; a text is always '''linear'''. | |||
** The diagram is the script of a computer program, the text is the entire iteration. | |||
* The written text is prefaced with an intro by the translator, which gives helpful context. | |||
* The text is '''not punctuated''' and only in '''lower case'''. This is probably meant to simulate a computer algorithm and mechanical processes, but it also resembles the stream of consciousness of a human. The lack of punctuation makes the text uncomfortable to read, it is easy to get lost in in it—but also entertaining. | |||
* The subject (“you”) never actually asks for a raise. A possible interpretation: Perec is trying to '''critique hierarchy of companies'''. | |||
* from the intro: there’s an ''“exhilarating potential of repetitiveness and recursion”'' | |||
* ''“decide to try your luck afresh tomorrow”'' | |||
* “circumperambulate”: to walk/wander without a destiny in circles (webster: to circle on foot especially ritualistically); in portuguese ''perambular'' means to wander | |||
===Marcel Bénabou: Rule and Constraint (org.: La règle et la contrainte)=== | ===Marcel Bénabou: Rule and Constraint (org.: La règle et la contrainte)=== | ||
Revision as of 15:09, 15 October 2025
Annotations, sketches, shards, snippets, marginalia
Please use headers and edit subsections only to avoid parallel edit problems :)
Uncreative Writing: Bart's Note
Date: 17/09/2025
Reading group: Bart - Ema - Robin - Tommi - Youjung
Protocol: We took turns reading pieces of the physical book out loud. While one person is reading, the others will take notes in a digital copy of the text.
Pad: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/UncreativeWriting_Notes
Notes:
Another subheader :)
Methods 2025-10-01: Group Discussions Of Texts That Had Been Read
Georges Perec: The Art of Asking your Boss for a Raise (org.: L'art et la manière d'aborder son chef de service pour lui demander une augmentation)
- There are different versions of this work: a diagram, a text, a radio broadcast > we mostly engaged with the text and/or the diagram.
- The experiences of “reading” the flow chart and the text are very different:
- The concept of the diagram is a loop; a text is always linear.
- The diagram is the script of a computer program, the text is the entire iteration.
- The written text is prefaced with an intro by the translator, which gives helpful context.
- The text is not punctuated and only in lower case. This is probably meant to simulate a computer algorithm and mechanical processes, but it also resembles the stream of consciousness of a human. The lack of punctuation makes the text uncomfortable to read, it is easy to get lost in in it—but also entertaining.
- The subject (“you”) never actually asks for a raise. A possible interpretation: Perec is trying to critique hierarchy of companies.
- from the intro: there’s an “exhilarating potential of repetitiveness and recursion”
- “decide to try your luck afresh tomorrow”
- “circumperambulate”: to walk/wander without a destiny in circles (webster: to circle on foot especially ritualistically); in portuguese perambular means to wander
Marcel Bénabou: Rule and Constraint (org.: La règle et la contrainte)
- Rule is a metric or a form while a constraint is a generative result
- Benabou argues in favour of constraint and points out to both strict and freedom-based literary schools of thought, as if they were missing the whole point of language: which is to be treated as an object in itself, not a mere conveyor of information.
- Some forms of constraint are accepted/desired: poetic forms like an alexandrine or a sonnet (also, haiku or limerick) have specific rhyme schemes, or a set number of syllables or lines
- Constraints does not confine the authors but liberates them, you escape from your own censorship.
- Constraints can enhance your creativity by limiting your toolset. Rules are for comprehension, constraints are for cerativity.
- Language is something material, i think about the container(like a book, laptop) but language & rules itself have a material, what differentiates grammar and crazy writing machines
- "Each page is a bed where letters lie"
- "Constraint forces the system out of its routine functioning, thereby compelling it to reveal its hidden resources"
- "Constraint goes beyond rules, people who have questioned language can escape the system and reveal hidden resources" – maybe a reason why someone starts to learn coding to understand the constraints
Raymond Queneau: A Story as You Like It
- Interesting to put this into the context of the time when it was created, modern day the stories are very complex but might have been interesting back in the days.
- All of the choices that you get at the end is very opinionated, everything is a opinion which is quite different from asking your boss for a raise. In this, reader casts a judgement to the choice and story.
Paul Fournel: The Theater Tree — A Combinatory Play
- Example for different ways of writing scripts/texts (like a "choose your own adventure games")
- Black mirror: pretended that the way the story was made is revelutionary, but actually it was not! Fournels ideas at the time also not revolutionary
- Similiar structure to Italo Calvino's books
Michael Winkler: Where Signs Resemble Thoughts
- Michael Winkler: both an author and an artist
- Llanguage is a code (we all came up with it and agreed on it)
- The point of a code: someone else has to be able to understand
- Winkler made symbols out of words by connecting the letters within a circle (there are other possible codes!)
- Connecting the words with the symblos, it's possible to reflect on the word itself > serendipity
- Interesting exercise to take language (and words) apart and look at the single components
- Ideographic: (greek: ideo = that is seen; gramma: letter / written sign)
- Other writing systems are (more) symbolic in themselves
> with e.g. Chinese a system like winkler's would be way more compilcated
> sign for "fire" looks like a bonfire, for "person" looks like a stick figure - Visually resembles the connection between stars (as in astrology)
- Language as a code is underlying computing, but the codes in computing are very inaccessible to people using other writing systems
- Xu Bing !