User:Kim/Stations, Skills, Resources/Workshops: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Workshops I organized==
;XPUB
:[https://git.xpub.nl/kim/gitpub-workshop GitPub] – May 26
:[[User:Kim/Prototyping 2nd year/Modify Delete Merge Repeat (Workshop)|Modify Delete Merge Repeat (Workshop)]] - Jan 26
:[[User:Kim/Prototyping 2nd year/Writing Scripts (Workshop)|Writing Scripts (Workshop)]] - Nov 25
:[[Alt Text Workshop]] - Oct 25
:[[Wiki Website Workshop]] - Oct 25
:[[HTML/CSS Memo]] - Nov 24
;other
:[https://kimkleinert.com/workshops/kabky1-sites-paths/ Sites and Paths] Mar - 26
:[https://czkaa.github.io/workshop-hbk-braunschweig/index.html My website is a ...] - Dec 24
:[https://kimkleinert.com/interfacingtime/ Interfacing time] - Nov 24
==Technologies of Solidarity==
==Technologies of Solidarity==
October 10th 2025 at V2 with Varia
October 10th 2025 at V2 with Varia
Line 11: Line 24:
:https://cc.practices.tools/octomode/technologies%20of%20solidarity/pad/
:https://cc.practices.tools/octomode/technologies%20of%20solidarity/pad/
:https://delta.chat/en/
:https://delta.chat/en/
After Varia (Simon and Lukas) introduced themselves and their tools we delved into a round of sharing tools/technologies we use. On the example of Signal (messenger) we made up evaluation parameters of the technology. Important to highlight that nothing is ''good'' or ''bad'' but on a scale. Many of the parameter sparked further discussions such as the question of safety (for whom, from whom) or the freedom an time to choose more labourous technologies over corporate ones. Here are a few parameter examples:
free <---(freemium)---> paid for
money comes from good <-------------------------> money comes from evil
libre <-----> locked
open-source <-----> closed-source
stable <-----> precarious
decentralised <-----> centralised
sustainable <-----> unsustainable
ethical <--------> unethical (military, free palestine)
US <-----------> Non-US
made by friends <-------(parasocial relationship)----> made by strangers
we think theyre good <-----------------------------> we think theyre bad
the data/money goes to friends <-------------------------> the data/money goes to strangers
was i forced <-----------------------------------> did i choose to be there
can i express myself the way i want (tech/social) <---------------------> i must conform (tech/social)
do i need a smartphone <-----------------------> do i not need a smartphone
funny          <-------------------------------*--> not funny
made by friends <----*(parasocial relationship)----> made by strangers
easy to use    <----------------------------------> not easy
safe from corporations <--------------------------> unsafe
safe from the state <-----------------------------> unsafe
safe from my peers <------------------------------> unsafe
towards the end the then conversation shifted towards ''transparency as a tactic'' encryption, trust (in companies or in your peers) and invisibility


==How to cook with Batteries==
==How to cook with Batteries==
Septmeber 19th - 21st at IMAL with Marie Verdeil and Dasha Ilina
Septmeber 19th - 21st at IMAL with Marie Verdeil and Dasha Ilina
<gallery>
Lemon-battery.jpeg|Lemon battery with capacitors
Lemon-battery-diagram.jpeg|diagram of the lemon battery
Lemon-race-flag.jpeg|Battery powered race flag with switch
</gallery>


==Pen Pals==
==Pen Pals==

Latest revision as of 11:36, 30 April 2026

Workshops I organized

XPUB
GitPub – May 26
Modify Delete Merge Repeat (Workshop) - Jan 26
Writing Scripts (Workshop) - Nov 25
Alt Text Workshop - Oct 25
Wiki Website Workshop - Oct 25
HTML/CSS Memo - Nov 24
other
Sites and Paths Mar - 26
My website is a ... - Dec 24
Interfacing time - Nov 24

Technologies of Solidarity

October 10th 2025 at V2 with Varia

links
https://zim-wiki.org/
https://homebrewserver.club/
https://git.vvvvvvaria.org/explore/repos
https://coopcloud.tech/
https://bonfirenetworks.org/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_crisis
https://autonomic.zone/
https://cc.practices.tools/octomode/technologies%20of%20solidarity/pad/
https://delta.chat/en/

After Varia (Simon and Lukas) introduced themselves and their tools we delved into a round of sharing tools/technologies we use. On the example of Signal (messenger) we made up evaluation parameters of the technology. Important to highlight that nothing is good or bad but on a scale. Many of the parameter sparked further discussions such as the question of safety (for whom, from whom) or the freedom an time to choose more labourous technologies over corporate ones. Here are a few parameter examples:

free <---(freemium)---> paid for
money comes from good <-------------------------> money comes from evil
libre <-----> locked
open-source <-----> closed-source
stable <-----> precarious
decentralised <-----> centralised
sustainable <-----> unsustainable
ethical <--------> unethical (military, free palestine)
US <-----------> Non-US
made by friends <-------(parasocial relationship)----> made by strangers
we think theyre good <-----------------------------> we think theyre bad
the data/money goes to friends <-------------------------> the data/money goes to strangers
was i forced <-----------------------------------> did i choose to be there
can i express myself the way i want (tech/social) <---------------------> i must conform (tech/social)
do i need a smartphone <-----------------------> do i not need a smartphone
funny           <-------------------------------*--> not funny
made by friends <----*(parasocial relationship)----> made by strangers
easy to use     <----------------------------------> not easy
safe from corporations <--------------------------> unsafe
safe from the state <-----------------------------> unsafe
safe from my peers <------------------------------> unsafe

towards the end the then conversation shifted towards transparency as a tactic encryption, trust (in companies or in your peers) and invisibility

How to cook with Batteries

Septmeber 19th - 21st at IMAL with Marie Verdeil and Dasha Ilina

Pen Pals

2 Day Workshop Initiated by Declarations at Varia Rotterdam. We looked at e-mails and forms to write css into this or as correspondence.

Not all Mail clients allow to write/ view HTML and CSS. the two we used were Proton mail (which allows inline style tags) or Thunderbird. The later comes with an extension that allows you to open and edit e-mails in HTML so you can easily add a style tag to the head.
Another fun experiment was to add some HTML and styling to an e-mails signature. Some mail clients allow you to either upload a file as signature or add text in HTML or Markup language. The styles in one signature then infect a whole e-mail thread.