User:Queenfeline/Thesisproposal: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
<span style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size:25pt; line-height: 25pt;">How do participatory speech practices about sexist language become a feminist method of unlearning and redefinition?</span>
<span style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size:25pt; line-height: 25pt;">How do participatory speech practices about sexist language become a feminist method of unlearning and redefinition?</span>
====Intro====
====Intro====
::– Introducing my project briefly (consciousness-raising group)
::In this essay I will explore how participatory speech practices can function not only as reflective dialogue but as a feminist methodology that enables unlearning internalized sexism and collectively redefining meaning. I will analyze that through my experiences of my project part, which is a series of consciousness-raising meetings that invite participants to speak about our the sexist language embedded in everyday life.
::– Stating what do I want to uncover in this essay
::I want to show why language matters, how it shapes perception and identity, and why it is a feminist issue.
::– Outline chapters briefly


====Chapter 1====
====Chapter 1====
Line 20: Line 19:


====Conclusion====
====Conclusion====
::  
::Compare my expectations to the actual outcome


====Glossary====
====Glossary====
::The glossary will contain words that, I find, need more explanation
::The glossary will contain words that, I find, need more explanation

Revision as of 17:53, 17 November 2025

How do participatory speech practices about sexist language become a feminist method of unlearning and redefinition?

Intro

In this essay I will explore how participatory speech practices can function not only as reflective dialogue but as a feminist methodology that enables unlearning internalized sexism and collectively redefining meaning. I will analyze that through my experiences of my project part, which is a series of consciousness-raising meetings that invite participants to speak about our the sexist language embedded in everyday life.
I want to show why language matters, how it shapes perception and identity, and why it is a feminist issue.

Chapter 1

This chapter introduces language as a social construct that reflects and reinforces patriarchal power.
– there are multiple ways in which women are oppressed by and through language, but that would take too long to discover so I will focus on the act of naming and through that the validating of experiences

Chapter 2

This chapter will speak about the concept (and history) of consciousness raising groups in the 70s
– then it will uncover how that method is still valuable in our time
– and how collective dialogue can lead to new interpretations of words and how the feeling of togetherness builds consciousness, political will and power.

Chapter 3

This chapter will combine the theory with my lived experiences through the meetings
– What was my experience in these meetings? What other peoples? (get feedback from them)
– How did that reflect or not reflect the theory?

Conclusion

Compare my expectations to the actual outcome

Glossary

The glossary will contain words that, I find, need more explanation