User:Sevgi/Licensing Workshop - Revision history

Sevgi at 08:35, 5 July 2026

2026-07-05T08:35:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:35, 5 July 2026
Line 89:		Line 89:

	https://reuse.constantvzw.org/index.php?title=Reuse_Case:_Conceptual_Poetry		https://reuse.constantvzw.org/index.php?title=Reuse_Case:_Conceptual_Poetry
			:
			:
			:[[File:IMG 1942.jpeg\|center\|thumb]][[File:IMG 1943.jpeg\|center\|thumb]]
			:
	::BUT A DEDICATION IS ONLY FELICITOUS IF PERFORMED BEFORE WITNESSES – IT IS AN ESSENTIALLY PUBLIC SURRENDER LIKE THAT OF STANDARDS OF BATTLE). (Anne Carson)<ref>Chapter title from Beauty of the Husband by Anne Carson</ref><br>		::BUT A DEDICATION IS ONLY FELICITOUS IF PERFORMED BEFORE WITNESSES – IT IS AN ESSENTIALLY PUBLIC SURRENDER LIKE THAT OF STANDARDS OF BATTLE). (Anne Carson)<ref>Chapter title from Beauty of the Husband by Anne Carson</ref><br>

Sevgi: /* Short History of Copy -> Right? */

2026-04-20T12:49:33Z

Short History of Copy -> Right?

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:49, 20 April 2026
Line 26:		Line 26:

	== Short History of Copy -> Right? ==		== Short History of Copy -> Right? ==
	[https://~~hub~~.xpub.nl/~~cerealbox~~/~~~sevgi/XPUB2/Licensing/deneme2~~.html Timeline]		[https://project.xpub.nl/resurrection/timeline.html Timeline]

	https://github.com/ErikMcClure/bad-licenses/		https://github.com/ErikMcClure/bad-licenses/

Sevgi: /* Open Mic */

2026-04-14T13:32:08Z

Open Mic

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:32, 14 April 2026
Line 185:		Line 185:
	=== Open Mic ===		=== Open Mic ===
	Monday Poetry Slam		Monday Poetry Slam

	~~my humble example~~

	Once it was born, I decided to record every word that comes out of its mouth. Every single sound. I wanted these sounds to travel the world. I wanted them to lay on paper and in minds of other people. I wanted to show the world; my body has made sound and sense through another life. Shout along what has been written so far; AA EE OO.<ref>sevgis entry</ref>

	=== Other Guides ===		=== Other Guides ===

Sevgi: /* Write a draft */

2026-04-13T10:16:22Z

Write a draft

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:16, 13 April 2026
Line 179:		Line 179:
	* Performance rights: the right to perform the copyrighted work publicly, (for example having a reading of the book or a dramatic performance of a play)		* Performance rights: the right to perform the copyrighted work publicly, (for example having a reading of the book or a dramatic performance of a play)
	* Display rights: the right to display the copyrighted work publicly (for example showing a film or work of art)		* Display rights: the right to display the copyrighted work publicly (for example showing a film or work of art)


			[[User:Sevgi/Our_Interpretive_Licenses]]

	=== Open Mic ===		=== Open Mic ===

Sevgi: /* Draw your audience */

2026-04-13T10:11:39Z

Draw your audience

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:11, 13 April 2026
Line 159:		Line 159:

	=== Draw your audience ===		=== Draw your audience ===
			[[User:Sevgi/Biggest_Fans_And_Mildest_Enthusiasts]]

	- Your biggest fan		- Your biggest fan

Sevgi: /* Short History of Copy -> Right? */

2026-04-13T08:43:00Z

Short History of Copy -> Right?

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:43, 13 April 2026
Line 37:		Line 37:
	{\| class="wikitable"		{\| class="wikitable"
	\|-		\|-
	! !![[Public domain]] & [[Public-domain-equivalent license\|equivalents]]!!{{yes\|}}[[Permissive license]]!![[Copyleft]] (protective license)!![[Non-commercial activity\|Noncommercial]] license!![[Proprietary license]]!![[Trade secret]]		! !![https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public domain Public domain] & [[Public-domain-equivalent license\|equivalents]]!!{{yes\|}}[[Permissive license]]!![[Copyleft]] (protective license)!![[Non-commercial activity\|Noncommercial]] license!![[Proprietary license]]!![[Trade secret]]
	\|-		\|-
	! scope="row" \|Description		! scope="row" \|Description

Sevgi: /* Short History of Copy -> Right? */

2026-04-13T08:29:17Z

Short History of Copy -> Right?

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:29, 13 April 2026
Line 26:		Line 26:

	== Short History of Copy -> Right? ==		== Short History of Copy -> Right? ==
	[https://hub.xpub.nl/cerealbox/~sevgi/XPUB2/Licensing/deneme2.html Timeline]		[https://hub.xpub.nl/cerealbox/~sevgi/XPUB2/Licensing/deneme2.html Timeline]

			https://github.com/ErikMcClure/bad-licenses/

	"the rule of exclusion has become the default rule in copyright. "<ref>https://monoskop.org/images/1/1e/Liang_Lawrence_Guide_to_Open_Content_Licenses_v1_2_2015.pdf</ref>		"the rule of exclusion has become the default rule in copyright. "<ref>https://monoskop.org/images/1/1e/Liang_Lawrence_Guide_to_Open_Content_Licenses_v1_2_2015.pdf</ref>

Sevgi: /* Words[4] */

2026-04-13T08:28:44Z

Words[4]

@@ Line 57: / Line 57: @@
 [https://www.clarabougon.ovh/pdfs/2024_05_22_poster_licence_en_A3.pdf Download link to map of creative commons licenses by Clara Bougon]
 == Enforceability / Interfacing the Law ==
@@ Line 242: / Line 191: @@
 https://reuse.constantvzw.org/index.php?title=Questions_(no_answers)
 == References ==

Sevgi: /* Write your own :)[18] */

2026-04-13T07:52:08Z

Write your own :)[18]

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:52, 13 April 2026
Line 206:		Line 206:

	== Write your own :)<ref>https://reuse.constantvzw.org/index.php?title=Practice_Documents</ref> ==		== Write your own :)<ref>https://reuse.constantvzw.org/index.php?title=Practice_Documents</ref> ==
	~~https://git.pixie.town/thufie/npl-builder~~

	~~https://www.researchdatashare.org/content/okune~~-~~angela~~-~~2019~~-~~may-21-self-review-citational-practice-zenodo~~		=== Draw your audience ===
			- Your biggest fan

			- Not an enthusiast

			=== Write a draft ===
			- Haiku (5,7,5)

	~~https://reuse.constantvzw.org/images/7/7c/Rewrite_of_Self~~-~~Review_of_Citational_practice.txt~~		- Short paragraph

	~~https://reuse.constantvzw.org/index.php?title=Questions_~~(~~no_answers~~)		- Draft an actual license(definitions, terms, declaration of time and date)

	*Title		*Title
Line 222:		Line 227:
	* Display rights: the right to display the copyrighted work publicly (for example showing a film or work of art)		* Display rights: the right to display the copyrighted work publicly (for example showing a film or work of art)

			=== Open Mic ===
			Monday Poetry Slam

			my humble example

			Once it was born, I decided to record every word that comes out of its mouth. Every single sound. I wanted these sounds to travel the world. I wanted them to lay on paper and in minds of other people. I wanted to show the world; my body has made sound and sense through another life. Shout along what has been written so far; AA EE OO.<ref>sevgis entry</ref>

	~~Once it was born, I decided to record every word that comes out of its mouth~~. ~~Every single sound~~. ~~I wanted these sounds to travel the world~~. ~~I wanted them to lay on paper and in minds of other people~~. ~~I wanted to show the world; my body has made sound and sense through another life~~. ~~Shout along what has been written so far; AA EE OO~~.~~<ref>sevgis entry<~~/~~ref>~~		=== Other Guides ===
			https://git.pixie.town/thufie/npl-builder

			https://www.researchdatashare.org/content/okune-angela-2019-may-21-self-review-citational-practice-zenodo

			https://reuse.constantvzw.org/images/7/7c/Rewrite_of_Self-Review_of_Citational_practice.txt

			https://reuse.constantvzw.org/index.php?title=Questions_(no_answers)

	== References ==		== References ==

Sevgi: /* Can I just make up my own license? */

2026-04-13T07:43:59Z

Can I just make up my own license?

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:43, 13 April 2026
Line 124:		Line 124:
	----"The law is composed of different things: you have rules that are not immutable. They are, at some point, decided on, and then you can change them by way of a new legislative act. For instance, being able to vote at the age of 18 is a rule. So, it is 18, not 19, not 16. So you’d have to change that if you wanted that. But most of the law is not constituted by rules like that'''. It’s constituted by processes of deciding cases.''' For instance, the norm of liability says that anyone who causes damage to someone is responsible and has to compensate for the damage. This rule seems very straightforward, but it is just a standard statement. '''You have a lot of different ways to interpret it: what does it mean to cause damage?''' You have all these elements that are part of the legal process, where '''the courts do that work of interpreting.''' This case law, as it’s called, can change and it does change all the time. This is also a process of changing the law. And then you have all the elements that are not determined, you have new issues popping up. For example, can a work that is created by artificial intelligence be protected by copyright? That is not accounted for in law anywhere in the world, it’s a new question.		----"The law is composed of different things: you have rules that are not immutable. They are, at some point, decided on, and then you can change them by way of a new legislative act. For instance, being able to vote at the age of 18 is a rule. So, it is 18, not 19, not 16. So you’d have to change that if you wanted that. But most of the law is not constituted by rules like that'''. It’s constituted by processes of deciding cases.''' For instance, the norm of liability says that anyone who causes damage to someone is responsible and has to compensate for the damage. This rule seems very straightforward, but it is just a standard statement. '''You have a lot of different ways to interpret it: what does it mean to cause damage?''' You have all these elements that are part of the legal process, where '''the courts do that work of interpreting.''' This case law, as it’s called, can change and it does change all the time. This is also a process of changing the law. And then you have all the elements that are not determined, you have new issues popping up. For example, can a work that is created by artificial intelligence be protected by copyright? That is not accounted for in law anywhere in the world, it’s a new question.

	With a few norms and a few rules and standards and principles of copyright, we can deal with that question, but we can have different opinions, and then we can say, oh, maybe at the moment it will not be protected by copyright, and maybe we need to have new legislation to decide about that case. The law is in constant change. How do we change copyright? Then we have a lot of things that we had earlier, that the law does not decide on but leaves for the parties or the persons to decide for themselves. A contract just states what the rules are that have to be followed, but the law doesn’t say that, OK, if you write a book and you publish it, the publisher will have to pay you that amount of money. In some countries, it says the authors will transfer the copyright to the publisher and need to be paid to receive a proportionate and fair remuneration. That’s just a standard, but it doesn’t say it has to be 25% or 5%. You have the standard and then the parties decide. How do we change copyright law? First, we experiment with it. And this is what has been done with Open Access and copyleft licences for the last 20 years. I think it’s interesting to recognise that Open Access licences have just been experimenting with the law that recognises that authors enjoy copyright and the power to prohibit or authorise the use of their works.		With a few norms and a few rules and standards and principles of copyright, we can deal with that question, but we can have different opinions, and then we can say, oh, maybe at the moment it will not be protected by copyright, and maybe we need to have new legislation to decide about that case. The law is in constant change. How do we change copyright? Then we have a lot of things that we had earlier, that the law does not decide on but leaves for the parties or the persons to decide for themselves. A contract just states what the rules are that have to be followed, but the law doesn’t say that, OK, if you write a book and you publish it, the publisher will have to pay you that amount of money. In some countries, it says the authors will transfer the copyright to the publisher and need to be paid to receive a proportionate and fair remuneration. That’s just a standard, but it doesn’t say it has to be 25% or 5%. You have the standard and then the parties decide. '''How do we change copyright law? First, we experiment with it.''' And this is what has been done with Open Access and copyleft licences for the last 20 years. I think it’s interesting to recognise that Open Access licences have just been experimenting with the law that recognises that authors enjoy copyright and the power to prohibit or authorise the use of their works.

	Copyleft movements have experimented with the authorisation part of copyright in a new way; they have created a new norm, and a new law. This is the first way to change the law. The second is to plead for a legislative change. And then the other is to develop new legal arguments that can be welcomed by the courts, because there is still some uncertainty as to how to interpret the legal standard, or there is a new question for which there is no legal answer. This is what the courts and what we as copyright lawyers are doing all the time. We argue when to use the theories of copyrights or what copyright should be or is about and play with the rules and with what the rules are not ruling. What are the holes in copyright that have to be filled, or sometimes not, but have to maybe be left unexplored to allow for experimentation? There are a lot of ways in which to change copyright law. It is not immutable, and it isn’t complete. Not everything a creator does is regulated by law. A lot of things are still in the shadow of the law in a way."<ref>Parse Journal issue 21 Ecologies of Dissemination: Conversation Transcripts.</ref>		Copyleft movements have experimented with the authorisation part of copyright in a new way; they have created a new norm, and a new law. This is the first way to change the law. '''The second is to plead for a legislative change.''' '''And then the other is to develop new legal arguments that can be welcomed by the courts, because there is still some uncertainty as to how to interpret the legal standard, or there is a new question for which there is no legal answer.''' This is what the courts and what we as copyright lawyers are doing all the time. We argue when to use the theories of copyrights or what copyright should be or is about and play with the rules and with what the rules are not ruling. '''What are the holes in copyright that have to be filled, or sometimes not, but have to maybe be left unexplored to allow for experimentation?''' There are a lot of ways in which to change copyright law. It is not immutable, and it isn’t complete. Not everything a creator does is regulated by law. '''A lot of things are still in the shadow of the law in a way.'''"<ref>Parse Journal issue 21 Ecologies of Dissemination: Conversation Transcripts.</ref>

	== Poetic Licenses and Interpretation in Law ==		== Poetic Licenses and Interpretation in Law ==
	Ownership and the financial ties that a creation generate are very interesting to me. I think we create and without intention this creation takes on a financial sovereignty ~~(finansal egemenlik)~~. If the ownership of the creation changes then it is a very interesting situation because owning art on its own is a complicated thing. The art piece becomes an asset, which then can be sold. It has its own rights, its own life.		Ownership and the financial ties that a creation generate are very interesting to me. I think we create and without intention this creation takes on a (financial and other modes of) sovereignty. If the ownership of the creation changes then it is a very interesting situation because owning art on its own is a complicated thing. The art piece becomes an asset, which then can be sold. It has its own rights, its own life.

	This year we all became authors. Authorship evokes really interesting feelings; pride, disappointment, anxiety, doubt, self-doubt. As we come towards the end of it we can start looking at what comes next; JUDGEMENT. heheh no :) I mean public. Whether we publish our thesis or not, we are entitled to control its interaction and ~~interface~~ with the world. The license is an agreement we make with the public to decide on how the world deals with the creation.		This year we all became authors. Authorship evokes really interesting feelings; pride, disappointment, anxiety, doubt, self-doubt. As we come towards the end of it we can start looking at what comes next; JUDGEMENT. heheh no :) I mean the public. Whether we publish our thesis or not, we are entitled to control its interaction and interfacing side with the world. The license is an agreement we make with the public to decide on how the world deals with the creation.
			[[File:Interfacinglaw.png\|center\|thumb\|600x600px]]

	== Poetic Examples of Sharing it with Others ==		== Poetic Examples of Sharing it with Others ==