User:Queenfeline/catch a brainstorm - Revision history

Queenfeline at 08:52, 31 October 2025

2025-10-31T08:52:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:52, 31 October 2025
Line 31:		Line 31:
	–[https://patorjk.com/software/taag/#p=display&f=Graffiti&t=Type%20Something%20 ASCII Art font generator] </br>		–[https://patorjk.com/software/taag/#p=display&f=Graffiti&t=Type%20Something%20 ASCII Art font generator] </br>
	– [https://git.xpub.nl/XPUB/git_workshop/src/branch/main/NOTES.md How to git workshop with michael]		– [https://git.xpub.nl/XPUB/git_workshop/src/branch/main/NOTES.md How to git workshop with michael]

			– [https://git.xpub.nl/XPUB/git_workshop/src/branch/main/NOTES.md Michaels git workshop]

	– How do we consider practise, not just product?		– How do we consider practise, not just product?

Queenfeline at 08:36, 14 October 2025

2025-10-14T08:36:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:36, 14 October 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
			<div style="font-family: monospace; background-color: #F896D8; padding: 2em;margin:5em;">
	~~[[File~~:~~Cheesymotivation~~.~~jpg\|right\|frameless]]~~		'''CRUSHING AS A TOOL FOR RESEARCH''': Listen to your impulses and intuition while approaching a certain topic. Take thinking-feeling and embracing the not-yet-knowing seriously. Temporarily postpone the search for words. Trust your fascinations. Become a gatherer. Sourround yourself with your crushes in material and spirit. Make fan folders for all of your crushes. Feed them. Let the stuff that inspires you talk back to you.
			::::Implicate yourself in your work and your points of critique. Vulnerability is a powerful tool. Allow yourself to crush and crush again.
	~~So yeahhhh here we are~~.		::Unravel the presumed linearity of articulating an idea first, then experimenting, then producing results.
			:::::Imagine yourself as part of an organic entity of dynamic directions, movements, associations, expressions and positions. Visualize your process backwards. Work parallel on all ends (writing, reading, designing, making). Let visual material inform your words, let words become strategies for visual gestures.
	~~i will do my master~~.		<span style="font-size:15pt; font-family:Times New Roman; font-style:italic;">Crushing is recommended for all areas of research <333</span>
			</div>
	~~this will happen~~.

	~~so here are ideas~~

	~~i guess~~...

	Project proposal: 1500 Words, kinda like a PMOMM used as a guide for the project part		Project proposal: 1500 Words, kinda like a PMOMM used as a guide for the project part

	Thesis: 7000-8000 Words,		Thesis: 7000-8000 Words,
			::<span style="font-size:20pt">Reclaiming language</span> [[User:Queenfeline/Words We Inherit, Words We Invent]]
			</br>

	~~<span style="font-size:20pt">"Catch a brainstorm"</span> </br>~~

	::<span style="font-size:20pt">Reclaiming language</span> [[User:Queenfeline/Words We Inherit, Words We Invent]] </br>
	::: How are feminist values encoded—or silenced—through language and publishing formats?		::: How are feminist values encoded—or silenced—through language and publishing formats?
	:: How do feminist movements use language to resist, redefine, or reclaim power?		:: How do feminist movements use language to resist, redefine, or reclaim power?
Line 36:		Line 26:

	</br>		</br>
			<span style="font-size:20pt">"Catch a brainstorm"</span> </br>

	– [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page Wikimedia Photo Archive] </br>		– [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page Wikimedia Photo Archive] </br>
	–[https://patorjk.com/software/taag/#p=display&f=Graffiti&t=Type%20Something%20 ASCII Art font generator] </br>		–[https://patorjk.com/software/taag/#p=display&f=Graffiti&t=Type%20Something%20 ASCII Art font generator] </br>

Queenfeline at 13:00, 29 September 2025

2025-09-29T13:00:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:00, 29 September 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~<div style="position:absolute; top:100px; right:10px;">~~
	[[File:Cheesymotivation.jpg\|right\|frameless]]		[[File:Cheesymotivation.jpg\|right\|frameless]]
	~~</div>~~
	So yeahhhh here we are.		So yeahhhh here we are.

Queenfeline at 12:59, 29 September 2025

2025-09-29T12:59:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:59, 29 September 2025
Line 38:		Line 38:
	– [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page Wikimedia Photo Archive] </br>		– [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page Wikimedia Photo Archive] </br>
	–[https://patorjk.com/software/taag/#p=display&f=Graffiti&t=Type%20Something%20 ASCII Art font generator] </br>		–[https://patorjk.com/software/taag/#p=display&f=Graffiti&t=Type%20Something%20 ASCII Art font generator] </br>
			– [https://git.xpub.nl/XPUB/git_workshop/src/branch/main/NOTES.md How to git workshop with michael]

	– How do we consider practise, not just product?		– How do we consider practise, not just product?

Queenfeline at 10:05, 25 September 2025

2025-09-25T10:05:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:05, 25 September 2025
Line 20:		Line 20:
	<span style="font-size:20pt">"Catch a brainstorm"</span> </br>		<span style="font-size:20pt">"Catch a brainstorm"</span> </br>

	::<span style="font-size:20pt">Reclaiming language</span> [[Words We Inherit, Words We Invent]] </br>		::<span style="font-size:20pt">Reclaiming language</span> [[User:Queenfeline/Words We Inherit, Words We Invent]] </br>
	::: How are feminist values encoded—or silenced—through language and publishing formats?		::: How are feminist values encoded—or silenced—through language and publishing formats?
	:: How do feminist movements use language to resist, redefine, or reclaim power?		:: How do feminist movements use language to resist, redefine, or reclaim power?

Queenfeline at 10:17, 24 September 2025

2025-09-24T10:17:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:17, 24 September 2025
Line 32:		Line 32:
	::It is to nice to read literature on language and feminism from 30/40 years ago and see that a little bit has changed since then. Some examples don't work anymore cause the word has been actively reclaimed. (''Bitches wear furs.'' well hell yes they do!) On the other side it is crazy that we have come only this small way and there is still a big big need for feminism and still a long way to go till equality.		::It is to nice to read literature on language and feminism from 30/40 years ago and see that a little bit has changed since then. Some examples don't work anymore cause the word has been actively reclaimed. (''Bitches wear furs.'' well hell yes they do!) On the other side it is crazy that we have come only this small way and there is still a big big need for feminism and still a long way to go till equality.
	::::Deborah Cameron asks herself in her 1985 published book "Feminism and Linguistic Theory" why she writes another book on this topic and if there is not enough literature on this topic. Meanwhile I'm sitting here 40 years later and asking myself the same question haha so im taking that as a sign not not ask myself that anymore and just do it. If i find it necessary there will be other people who thing so too. AND, very important to ask, would a man ask himself that question? Richtig, Nein! Also machen wir das auch nicht!		::::Deborah Cameron asks herself in her 1985 published book "Feminism and Linguistic Theory" why she writes another book on this topic and if there is not enough literature on this topic. Meanwhile I'm sitting here 40 years later and asking myself the same question haha so im taking that as a sign not not ask myself that anymore and just do it. If i find it necessary there will be other people who thing so too. AND, very important to ask, would a man ask himself that question? Richtig, Nein! Also machen wir das auch nicht!

			::Oh something that clicked just now: Some women are a bit afraid of feminism, because it is a fight and that sounds so harsh and aggressive and they don't want to be associated with it. Which makes so much senseeee! Of course they don't want that cause society tells women to be loving and caring and not angry and strongly opinionated. They tell women that self sacrifice is normal and a good thing. So standing up for oneself and taking on 'male' attributes, such as powerful and strong and fighting, feels uncomfortable. and thats exactly what the patriarchy wants so women don't get comfortable rebelling against the system that holds them small.

	</br>		</br>

Queenfeline at 10:06, 24 September 2025

2025-09-24T10:06:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:06, 24 September 2025
Line 30:		Line 30:
	::::Why make it online and with that global? Different people all around the world make different experiences and in order to practice intersectionality it is important to also hear voices which widen your understanding of what it means to behave feministic in this day and age.		::::Why make it online and with that global? Different people all around the world make different experiences and in order to practice intersectionality it is important to also hear voices which widen your understanding of what it means to behave feministic in this day and age.
	:::A glossary is traditionally linear, authoritative, closed. But what if it was open-ended, networked, affective, or contradictory — like lived experience? Can definitions reflect lived experience, not just academic consensus? What happens to a glossary if we abandon objectivity and embrace subjectivity?		:::A glossary is traditionally linear, authoritative, closed. But what if it was open-ended, networked, affective, or contradictory — like lived experience? Can definitions reflect lived experience, not just academic consensus? What happens to a glossary if we abandon objectivity and embrace subjectivity?
	::It is to nice to read literature on language and feminism from 30/40 years ago and see that a little bit has changed since then. Some examples don't work anymore cause the word has been actively reclaimed. On the other side it is crazy that we have come only this small way and there is still a big big need for feminism and still a long way to go till equality.		::It is to nice to read literature on language and feminism from 30/40 years ago and see that a little bit has changed since then. Some examples don't work anymore cause the word has been actively reclaimed. (''Bitches wear furs.'' well hell yes they do!) On the other side it is crazy that we have come only this small way and there is still a big big need for feminism and still a long way to go till equality.
	::::Deborah Cameron asks herself in her 1985 published book "Feminism and Linguistic Theory" why she writes another book on this topic and if there is not enough literature on this topic. Meanwhile I'm sitting here 40 years later and asking myself the same question haha so im taking that as a sign not not ask myself that anymore and just do it. If i find it necessary there will be other people who thing so too. AND, very important to ask, would a man ask himself that question? Richtig, Nein! Also machen wir das auch nicht!		::::Deborah Cameron asks herself in her 1985 published book "Feminism and Linguistic Theory" why she writes another book on this topic and if there is not enough literature on this topic. Meanwhile I'm sitting here 40 years later and asking myself the same question haha so im taking that as a sign not not ask myself that anymore and just do it. If i find it necessary there will be other people who thing so too. AND, very important to ask, would a man ask himself that question? Richtig, Nein! Also machen wir das auch nicht!

Queenfeline at 10:00, 24 September 2025

2025-09-24T10:00:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:00, 24 September 2025
Line 29:		Line 29:
	::– Make my own feminist glossary – with the possibility for people to contribute to it in order to hear voices that mostly stay unheard.		::– Make my own feminist glossary – with the possibility for people to contribute to it in order to hear voices that mostly stay unheard.
	::::Why make it online and with that global? Different people all around the world make different experiences and in order to practice intersectionality it is important to also hear voices which widen your understanding of what it means to behave feministic in this day and age.		::::Why make it online and with that global? Different people all around the world make different experiences and in order to practice intersectionality it is important to also hear voices which widen your understanding of what it means to behave feministic in this day and age.
	:::A glossary is traditionally linear, authoritative, closed. But what if it was open-ended, networked, affective, or contradictory — like lived experience? Can definitions reflect lived experience, not just academic consensus? What happens to a glossary if we abandon objectivity and embrace subjectivity? It is to nice to read literature on language and feminism from 30/40 years ago and see that a little bit has changed since then. Some examples don't work anymore cause the word has been actively reclaimed. On the other side it is crazy that we have come only this small way and there is still a big big need for feminism and still a long way to go till equality. Deborah Cameron asks herself in her 1985 published book "Feminism and Linguistic Theory" why she writes another book on this topic and if there is not enough literature on this topic. Meanwhile I'm sitting here 40 years later and asking myself the same question haha so im taking that as a sign not not ask myself that anymore and just do it. If i find it necessary there will be other people who thing so too. AND, very important to ask, would a man ask himself that question? Richtig, Nein! Also machen wir das auch nicht!		:::A glossary is traditionally linear, authoritative, closed. But what if it was open-ended, networked, affective, or contradictory — like lived experience? Can definitions reflect lived experience, not just academic consensus? What happens to a glossary if we abandon objectivity and embrace subjectivity?
			::It is to nice to read literature on language and feminism from 30/40 years ago and see that a little bit has changed since then. Some examples don't work anymore cause the word has been actively reclaimed. On the other side it is crazy that we have come only this small way and there is still a big big need for feminism and still a long way to go till equality.
			::::Deborah Cameron asks herself in her 1985 published book "Feminism and Linguistic Theory" why she writes another book on this topic and if there is not enough literature on this topic. Meanwhile I'm sitting here 40 years later and asking myself the same question haha so im taking that as a sign not not ask myself that anymore and just do it. If i find it necessary there will be other people who thing so too. AND, very important to ask, would a man ask himself that question? Richtig, Nein! Also machen wir das auch nicht!

	</br>		</br>

Queenfeline at 09:59, 24 September 2025

2025-09-24T09:59:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:59, 24 September 2025
Line 29:		Line 29:
	::– Make my own feminist glossary – with the possibility for people to contribute to it in order to hear voices that mostly stay unheard.		::– Make my own feminist glossary – with the possibility for people to contribute to it in order to hear voices that mostly stay unheard.
	::::Why make it online and with that global? Different people all around the world make different experiences and in order to practice intersectionality it is important to also hear voices which widen your understanding of what it means to behave feministic in this day and age.		::::Why make it online and with that global? Different people all around the world make different experiences and in order to practice intersectionality it is important to also hear voices which widen your understanding of what it means to behave feministic in this day and age.
	:::A glossary is traditionally linear, authoritative, closed. But what if it was open-ended, networked, affective, or contradictory — like lived experience? Can definitions reflect lived experience, not just academic consensus? What happens to a glossary if we abandon objectivity and embrace subjectivity?		:::A glossary is traditionally linear, authoritative, closed. But what if it was open-ended, networked, affective, or contradictory — like lived experience? Can definitions reflect lived experience, not just academic consensus? What happens to a glossary if we abandon objectivity and embrace subjectivity? It is to nice to read literature on language and feminism from 30/40 years ago and see that a little bit has changed since then. Some examples don't work anymore cause the word has been actively reclaimed. On the other side it is crazy that we have come only this small way and there is still a big big need for feminism and still a long way to go till equality. Deborah Cameron asks herself in her 1985 published book "Feminism and Linguistic Theory" why she writes another book on this topic and if there is not enough literature on this topic. Meanwhile I'm sitting here 40 years later and asking myself the same question haha so im taking that as a sign not not ask myself that anymore and just do it. If i find it necessary there will be other people who thing so too. AND, very important to ask, would a man ask himself that question? Richtig, Nein! Also machen wir das auch nicht!

	</br>		</br>

Queenfeline at 09:24, 18 September 2025

2025-09-18T09:24:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:24, 18 September 2025
Line 10:		Line 10:
	so here are ideas		so here are ideas

	i guess		i guess...

			Project proposal: 1500 Words, kinda like a PMOMM used as a guide for the project part

			Thesis: 7000-8000 Words,



	<span style="font-size:20pt">"Catch a brainstorm"</span> </br>		<span style="font-size:20pt">"Catch a brainstorm"</span> </br>


	::<span style="font-size:20pt">Reclaiming language</span> [[Words We Inherit, Words We Invent]] </br>		::<span style="font-size:20pt">Reclaiming language</span> [[Words We Inherit, Words We Invent]] </br>