Quilt INC./Boundary Objects - Revision history

Marloes at 13:12, 27 March 2024

2024-03-27T13:12:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:12, 27 March 2024
Line 6:		Line 6:

	[[Category:Wordquilt]]		[[Category:Wordquilt]]
	[[Category:~~Quilt Inc.~~]]		[[Category:Quilt_INC]]

Vitrinekast at 15:16, 31 January 2024

2024-01-31T15:16:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:16, 31 January 2024
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Boundary objects are only boundary objects if they are acknowledged as boundary objects, when various communities of practice collaborate/intersect. If this doesn't happen, we might actually be dealing with a [[Quilt INC./Monster\|monster]].		Boundary objects are only boundary objects if they are acknowledged as boundary objects, when various communities of practice collaborate/intersect. If this doesn't happen, we might actually be dealing with a [[Quilt INC./Monster\|monster]].

	Coming from a programmers community of practice, the idea of a thing having various meanings has it's difficulties, as explained in the text as well. In the community of practice, we assign variables all day long, but they can only have one value. How can these various meanings be "handled" and can they even? Maybe this is the spot to show the seam, instead of trying to achieve the "seamless" experience. Are boundary objects created by showing seams, acknowledging the various interpretations and that they are open to change (use `let` not `const`)		Coming from a programmers community of practice, the idea of a thing having various meanings has it's difficulties, as explained in the text as well. In the community of practice, we assign variables all day long, but they can only have one value. How can these various meanings be "handled" and can they even? Maybe this is the spot to show the seam, instead of trying to achieve the "seamless" experience. Are boundary objects created by showing seams, acknowledging the various interpretations and that they are open to change (use <code>let</code> not <code>const</code>)

	[[Category:Wordquilt]]		[[Category:Wordquilt]]
	[[Category:Quilt Inc.]]		[[Category:Quilt Inc.]]

Vitrinekast at 15:15, 31 January 2024

2024-01-31T15:15:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:15, 31 January 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Boundary objects are, as described in the ''Misplaced Concretism and Concrete Situations: Feminism, Method, and Information Technology'', 'things' that are part of multiple [[Quilt INC./Communities of ~~practice~~\|Communities of Practice]], but have a different meaning for each community. The thing itself does not change when being passed around communities, but the way the 'thing' is interacted with or approached, (so the relationship with the thing) changes, or the reason why the thing is used changes.		Boundary objects are, as described in the ''Misplaced Concretism and Concrete Situations: Feminism, Method, and Information Technology'', 'things' that are part of multiple [[Quilt INC./Communities of Practice\|Communities of Practice]], but have a different meaning for each community. The thing itself does not change when being passed around communities, but the way the 'thing' is interacted with or approached, (so the relationship with the thing) changes, or the reason why the thing is used changes.

	Boundary objects are only boundary objects if they are acknowledged as boundary objects, when various communities of practice collaborate/intersect. If this doesn't happen, we might actually be dealing with a [[Quilt INC./Monster\|monster]].		Boundary objects are only boundary objects if they are acknowledged as boundary objects, when various communities of practice collaborate/intersect. If this doesn't happen, we might actually be dealing with a [[Quilt INC./Monster\|monster]].

Vitrinekast at 15:15, 31 January 2024

2024-01-31T15:15:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:15, 31 January 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Boundary objects are, as described in the Misplaced Concretism and Concrete Situations: Feminism, Method, and Information Technology, 'things' that are part of multiple [[Quilt INC./Communities of practice\|Communities of Practice]], but have a different meaning for each community. The thing itself does not change when being passed around communities, but the way the 'thing' is interacted with or approached, (so the relationship with the thing) changes, or the reason why the thing is used changes.		Boundary objects are, as described in the ''Misplaced Concretism and Concrete Situations: Feminism, Method, and Information Technology'', 'things' that are part of multiple [[Quilt INC./Communities of practice\|Communities of Practice]], but have a different meaning for each community. The thing itself does not change when being passed around communities, but the way the 'thing' is interacted with or approached, (so the relationship with the thing) changes, or the reason why the thing is used changes.

	Boundary objects are only boundary objects if they are acknowledged as boundary objects, when various communities of practice collaborate/intersect. If this doesn't happen, we might actually be dealing with a [[Quilt INC./Monster\|monster]].		Boundary objects are only boundary objects if they are acknowledged as boundary objects, when various communities of practice collaborate/intersect. If this doesn't happen, we might actually be dealing with a [[Quilt INC./Monster\|monster]].

Vitrinekast at 15:14, 31 January 2024

2024-01-31T15:14:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:14, 31 January 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Boundary objects are, as described in the Misplaced Concretism and Concrete Situations: Feminism, Method, and Information Technology, 'things' that are part of multiple [[Quilt INC./Communities of practice\|Communities of Practice]], but have a different meaning for each community. The thing itself does not change when being passed around communities, but the way the 'thing' is interacted with or approached, (so the relationship with the thing) changes, or the reason why the thing is used changes.		Boundary objects are, as described in the Misplaced Concretism and Concrete Situations: Feminism, Method, and Information Technology, 'things' that are part of multiple [[Quilt INC./Communities of practice\|Communities of Practice]], but have a different meaning for each community. The thing itself does not change when being passed around communities, but the way the 'thing' is interacted with or approached, (so the relationship with the thing) changes, or the reason why the thing is used changes.

	Boundary objects are only boundary objects if they are acknowledged as boundary objects, when various communities of practice collaborate/intersect. If this doesn't happen, we might actually be dealing with a [[Quilt INC./~~monster~~\|monster]].		Boundary objects are only boundary objects if they are acknowledged as boundary objects, when various communities of practice collaborate/intersect. If this doesn't happen, we might actually be dealing with a [[Quilt INC./Monster\|monster]].

	Coming from a programmers community of practice, the idea of a thing having various meanings has it's difficulties, as explained in the text as well. In the community of practice, we assign variables all day long, but they can only have one value. How can these various meanings be "handled" and can they even? Maybe this is the spot to show the seam, instead of trying to achieve the "seamless" experience. Are boundary objects created by showing seams, acknowledging the various interpretations and that they are open to change (use `let` not `const`)		Coming from a programmers community of practice, the idea of a thing having various meanings has it's difficulties, as explained in the text as well. In the community of practice, we assign variables all day long, but they can only have one value. How can these various meanings be "handled" and can they even? Maybe this is the spot to show the seam, instead of trying to achieve the "seamless" experience. Are boundary objects created by showing seams, acknowledging the various interpretations and that they are open to change (use `let` not `const`)

Vitrinekast at 15:05, 31 January 2024

2024-01-31T15:05:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:05, 31 January 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Boundary objects are, as described in the Misplaced Concretism and Concrete Situations: Feminism, Method, and Information Technology, 'things' that are part of multiple [[Quilt INC./Communities of practice\|Communities of ~~practice~~]], but have a different meaning for each community. The thing itself does not change when being passed around communities, but the way the 'thing' is interacted with or approached, (so the relationship with the thing) changes, or the reason why the thing is used changes.		Boundary objects are, as described in the Misplaced Concretism and Concrete Situations: Feminism, Method, and Information Technology, 'things' that are part of multiple [[Quilt INC./Communities of practice\|Communities of Practice]], but have a different meaning for each community. The thing itself does not change when being passed around communities, but the way the 'thing' is interacted with or approached, (so the relationship with the thing) changes, or the reason why the thing is used changes.

	Boundary objects are only boundary objects if they are acknowledged as boundary objects, when various communities of practice collaborate/intersect. If this doesn't happen, we might actually be dealing with a [[Quilt INC./monster\|monster]].		Boundary objects are only boundary objects if they are acknowledged as boundary objects, when various communities of practice collaborate/intersect. If this doesn't happen, we might actually be dealing with a [[Quilt INC./monster\|monster]].

Vitrinekast at 15:04, 31 January 2024

2024-01-31T15:04:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:04, 31 January 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Boundary objects are, as described in the Misplaced Concretism and Concrete Situations: Feminism, Method, and Information Technology, 'things' that are part of multiple [[~~communities~~ of practice]], but have a different meaning for each community. The thing itself does not change when being passed around communities, but the way the 'thing' is interacted with or approached, (so the relationship with the thing) changes, or the reason why the thing is used changes.		Boundary objects are, as described in the Misplaced Concretism and Concrete Situations: Feminism, Method, and Information Technology, 'things' that are part of multiple [[Quilt INC./Communities of practice\|Communities of practice]], but have a different meaning for each community. The thing itself does not change when being passed around communities, but the way the 'thing' is interacted with or approached, (so the relationship with the thing) changes, or the reason why the thing is used changes.

	Boundary objects are only boundary objects if they are acknowledged as boundary objects, when various communities of practice collaborate/intersect. If this doesn't happen, we might actually be dealing with a [[monster]].		Boundary objects are only boundary objects if they are acknowledged as boundary objects, when various communities of practice collaborate/intersect. If this doesn't happen, we might actually be dealing with a [[Quilt INC./monster\|monster]].

	Coming from a programmers community of practice, the idea of a thing having various meanings has it's difficulties, as explained in the text as well. In the community of practice, we assign variables all day long, but they can only have one value. How can these various meanings be "handled" and can they even? Maybe this is the spot to show the seam, instead of trying to achieve the "seamless" experience. Are boundary objects created by showing seams, acknowledging the various interpretations and that they are open to change (use `let` not `const`)		Coming from a programmers community of practice, the idea of a thing having various meanings has it's difficulties, as explained in the text as well. In the community of practice, we assign variables all day long, but they can only have one value. How can these various meanings be "handled" and can they even? Maybe this is the spot to show the seam, instead of trying to achieve the "seamless" experience. Are boundary objects created by showing seams, acknowledging the various interpretations and that they are open to change (use `let` not `const`)

Vitrinekast at 15:01, 31 January 2024

2024-01-31T15:01:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:01, 31 January 2024
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Coming from a programmers community of practice, the idea of a thing having various meanings has it's difficulties, as explained in the text as well. In the community of practice, we assign variables all day long, but they can only have one value. How can these various meanings be "handled" and can they even? Maybe this is the spot to show the seam, instead of trying to achieve the "seamless" experience. Are boundary objects created by showing seams, acknowledging the various interpretations and that they are open to change (use `let` not `const`)		Coming from a programmers community of practice, the idea of a thing having various meanings has it's difficulties, as explained in the text as well. In the community of practice, we assign variables all day long, but they can only have one value. How can these various meanings be "handled" and can they even? Maybe this is the spot to show the seam, instead of trying to achieve the "seamless" experience. Are boundary objects created by showing seams, acknowledging the various interpretations and that they are open to change (use `let` not `const`)

			[[Category:Wordquilt]]
			[[Category:Quilt Inc.]]

Vitrinekast: Created page with "Boundary objects are, as described in the Misplaced Concretism and Concrete Situations: Feminism, Method, and Information Technology, 'things' that are part of multiple communities of practice, but have a different meaning for each community. The thing itself does not change when being passed around communities, but the way the 'thing' is interacted with or approached, (so the relationship with the thing) changes, or the reason why the thing is used changes. Bound..."

2024-01-31T14:59:12Z

Created page with "Boundary objects are, as described in the *Misplaced Concretism and Concrete Situations: Feminism, Method, and Information Technology*, 'things' that are part of multiple communities of practice, but have a different meaning for each community. The thing itself does not change when being passed around communities, but the way the 'thing' is interacted with or approached, (so the relationship with the thing) changes, or the reason why the thing is used changes. Bound..."

New page

Boundary objects are, as described in the *Misplaced Concretism and Concrete Situations: Feminism, Method, and Information Technology*, 'things' that are part of multiple [[communities of practice]], but have a different meaning for each community. The thing itself does not change when being passed around communities, but the way the 'thing' is interacted with or approached, (so the relationship with the thing) changes, or the reason why the thing is used changes.

Boundary objects are only boundary objects if they are acknowledged as boundary objects, when various communities of practice collaborate/intersect. If this doesn't happen, we might actually be dealing with a [[monster]].

Coming from a programmers community of practice, the idea of a thing having various meanings has it's difficulties, as explained in the text as well. In the community of practice, we assign variables all day long, but they can only have one value. How can these various meanings be "handled" and can they even? Maybe this is the spot to show the seam, instead of trying to achieve the "seamless" experience. Are boundary objects created by showing seams, acknowledging the various interpretations and that they are open to change (use `let` not `const`)