Mia/Annotated Reader - Revision history

Mia: /* The annotated reader */

2019-03-31T07:00:47Z

The annotated reader

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:00, 31 March 2019
Line 21:		Line 21:
	*webpage		*webpage
	*user's guide		*user's guide
			*mind map as an inserted poster (folded, can be the first page of each chapter)

	5. The methods we used for studying the texts were diverse, however, they all seem to tie together towards the final reader. First, we individually took notes and/or made synopses of book's chapters. To find a common space for our thoughts and to be able to visualise connections between them, we used Milanote '''[https://app.milanote.com/1H43Rb1rxp429N BOARD]''' which allows us to add notes, texts, images, comments and organise the content. After reading the whole text, each of us chose a specific domain of interest and concentrated on it. This resulted in subtopics temporarily named Photographic Universe, The Apparatus, Information, Subverting the Program and Image. This workspace was convenient for sharing and freely adding content, however, at some point we realised that our content overgrew the form and became disorderly. To be able to translate it into a final reader, we decided to convert it into a (rather linear) form of text aka Word document.		5. The methods we used for studying the texts were diverse, however, they all seem to tie together towards the final reader. First, we individually took notes and/or made synopses of book's chapters. To find a common space for our thoughts and to be able to visualise connections between them, we used Milanote '''[https://app.milanote.com/1H43Rb1rxp429N BOARD]''' which allows us to add notes, texts, images, comments and organise the content. After reading the whole text, each of us chose a specific domain of interest and concentrated on it. This resulted in subtopics temporarily named Photographic Universe, The Apparatus, Information, Subverting the Program and Image. This workspace was convenient for sharing and freely adding content, however, at some point we realised that our content overgrew the form and became disorderly. To be able to translate it into a final reader, we decided to convert it into a (rather linear) form of text aka Word document.

Mia at 10:26, 30 March 2019

2019-03-30T10:26:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:26, 30 March 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
			[[User:Mia\|Go back to Mia's page]]

	=The annotated reader=		=The annotated reader=
	1. [[Calendars:Networked_Media_Calendar/Networked_Media_Calendar/20-03-2019_-Event_1\|Link to the RW&RM session in wiki calendar]]		1. [[Calendars:Networked_Media_Calendar/Networked_Media_Calendar/20-03-2019_-Event_1\|Link to the RW&RM session in wiki calendar]]

Mia at 10:25, 30 March 2019

2019-03-30T10:25:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:25, 30 March 2019
Line 24:		Line 24:
	Underneath is a draft page or a sketchbook for ideas, possible texts, forms and topics which represents a cluster of interests that we deal with in the process.		Underneath is a draft page or a sketchbook for ideas, possible texts, forms and topics which represents a cluster of interests that we deal with in the process.

	=the group (participants & interests)=		==the group (participants & interests)==
	Group 1: Cemal, Mia, Felix, Andreas, Sonia		Group 1: Cemal, Mia, Felix, Andreas, Sonia

Line 47:		Line 47:
	-Hito Steyerl		-Hito Steyerl

	=Suggested Readings=		==Suggested Readings==
	'''Joanna Zylinska: Nonhuman Photography - https://research.gold.ac.uk/20871/1/MED_Zylinska_2015c.pdf (intro) https://www.nonhuman.photography/		'''Joanna Zylinska: Nonhuman Photography - https://research.gold.ac.uk/20871/1/MED_Zylinska_2015c.pdf (intro) https://www.nonhuman.photography/

Mia at 10:24, 30 March 2019

2019-03-30T10:24:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:24, 30 March 2019
Line 68:		Line 68:

	more on image: Hans Belting: An Anthropology of Images - http://layoftheland.net/archive/art3959c/readings/out.pdf		more on image: Hans Belting: An Anthropology of Images - http://layoftheland.net/archive/art3959c/readings/out.pdf

	~~=What are the core interests of the group?=~~

	==Texts as a starting point==		==Texts as a starting point==
	*Vilem Flusser: Towards the Pholosophy of Photography		*Vilem Flusser: Towards the Pholosophy of Photography
	*Additional reading: Giorgio Agamben: What is the Apparatus?		*Additional reading: Giorgio Agamben: What is the Apparatus?
			*Sean Dorrance Kelly: ''A philosopher argues that an AI can't be an artist'' (an article)

Mia: /* The annotated reader */

2019-03-30T10:23:54Z

The annotated reader

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:23, 30 March 2019
Line 21:		Line 21:

	5. The methods we used for studying the texts were diverse, however, they all seem to tie together towards the final reader. First, we individually took notes and/or made synopses of book's chapters. To find a common space for our thoughts and to be able to visualise connections between them, we used Milanote '''[https://app.milanote.com/1H43Rb1rxp429N BOARD]''' which allows us to add notes, texts, images, comments and organise the content. After reading the whole text, each of us chose a specific domain of interest and concentrated on it. This resulted in subtopics temporarily named Photographic Universe, The Apparatus, Information, Subverting the Program and Image. This workspace was convenient for sharing and freely adding content, however, at some point we realised that our content overgrew the form and became disorderly. To be able to translate it into a final reader, we decided to convert it into a (rather linear) form of text aka Word document.		5. The methods we used for studying the texts were diverse, however, they all seem to tie together towards the final reader. First, we individually took notes and/or made synopses of book's chapters. To find a common space for our thoughts and to be able to visualise connections between them, we used Milanote '''[https://app.milanote.com/1H43Rb1rxp429N BOARD]''' which allows us to add notes, texts, images, comments and organise the content. After reading the whole text, each of us chose a specific domain of interest and concentrated on it. This resulted in subtopics temporarily named Photographic Universe, The Apparatus, Information, Subverting the Program and Image. This workspace was convenient for sharing and freely adding content, however, at some point we realised that our content overgrew the form and became disorderly. To be able to translate it into a final reader, we decided to convert it into a (rather linear) form of text aka Word document.

			Underneath is a draft page or a sketchbook for ideas, possible texts, forms and topics which represents a cluster of interests that we deal with in the process.

	=the group (participants & interests)=		=the group (participants & interests)=

Mia: /* The annotated reader */

2019-03-30T10:22:06Z

The annotated reader

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:22, 30 March 2019
Line 7:		Line 7:
	As a starting point we took the text by '''Vilem Flusser's - ''Towards the Philosophy of Photography'',''' since the author breaks down the mechanism of apparatus through the philosophy of photography. The process of studying the text included close reading individually, taking notes, making synopses, discussions, group readings, making a mind map, commenting and sharing our notes etc. During the process, as certain questions opened up, we chose additional texts:		As a starting point we took the text by '''Vilem Flusser's - ''Towards the Philosophy of Photography'',''' since the author breaks down the mechanism of apparatus through the philosophy of photography. The process of studying the text included close reading individually, taking notes, making synopses, discussions, group readings, making a mind map, commenting and sharing our notes etc. During the process, as certain questions opened up, we chose additional texts:
	*'''Giorgio Agamben: ''What is an Apparatus?''		*'''Giorgio Agamben: ''What is an Apparatus?''
	*Sean Dorrance Kelly: ''A philosopher argues that an AI can't be an artist'' (an article)'''		*'''Sean Dorrance Kelly: ''A philosopher argues that an AI can't be an artist'' (an article)'''

	Since the final reader is still in development, we might add other texts if necessary.		Since the final reader is still in development, we might add other texts if necessary.
Line 20:		Line 20:
	*user's guide		*user's guide

	5. The methods we used for studying the texts were diverse, however, they all seem to tie together towards the final reader. First, we individually took notes and/or made synopses of book's chapters. To find a common space for our thoughts and to be able to visualise connections between them, we used Milanote [https://app.milanote.com/1H43Rb1rxp429N BOARD] which allows us to add notes, texts, images, comments and organise the content. After reading the whole text, each of us chose a specific domain of interest and concentrated on it. This resulted in subtopics temporarily named Photographic Universe, The Apparatus, Information, Subverting the Program and Image. This workspace was convenient for sharing and freely adding content, however, at some point we realised that our content overgrew the form and became disorderly. To be able to translate it into a final reader, we decided to convert it into a (rather linear) form of text aka Word document.		5. The methods we used for studying the texts were diverse, however, they all seem to tie together towards the final reader. First, we individually took notes and/or made synopses of book's chapters. To find a common space for our thoughts and to be able to visualise connections between them, we used Milanote '''[https://app.milanote.com/1H43Rb1rxp429N BOARD]''' which allows us to add notes, texts, images, comments and organise the content. After reading the whole text, each of us chose a specific domain of interest and concentrated on it. This resulted in subtopics temporarily named Photographic Universe, The Apparatus, Information, Subverting the Program and Image. This workspace was convenient for sharing and freely adding content, however, at some point we realised that our content overgrew the form and became disorderly. To be able to translate it into a final reader, we decided to convert it into a (rather linear) form of text aka Word document.

	=the group (participants & interests)=		=the group (participants & interests)=

Mia: /* The annotated reader */

2019-03-30T10:21:20Z

The annotated reader

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:21, 30 March 2019
Line 4:		Line 4:
	2. ''The annotated reader'' is an approach to theoretical texts we find relevant or interesting (possibly in relation to our own practices). First the class divided in three groups each defined by a core text or domain of interest. We conduct this process of research for several weeks, aiming at an 'annotated reader' as a final result.		2. ''The annotated reader'' is an approach to theoretical texts we find relevant or interesting (possibly in relation to our own practices). First the class divided in three groups each defined by a core text or domain of interest. We conduct this process of research for several weeks, aiming at an 'annotated reader' as a final result.

	Our group (temporarily named) ''Living in the Black Box'' chose to focus on the structure of apparatus, taking photographic apparatus as an example and further investigate other apparatuses as an omnipresent structure in modern society.		3. Our group (temporarily named) ''Living in the Black Box'' chose to focus on the structure of apparatus, taking photographic apparatus as an example and further investigate other apparatuses as an omnipresent structure in modern society.
	As a starting point we took the text by Vilem Flusser's - Towards the Philosophy of Photography, since the author breaks down the mechanism of apparatus through the philosophy of photography. The process of studying the text included close reading individually, taking notes, making synopses, discussions, group readings, making a mind map, commenting and sharing our notes etc. During the process, as certain questions opened up, we chose additional texts:		As a starting point we took the text by '''Vilem Flusser's - ''Towards the Philosophy of Photography'',''' since the author breaks down the mechanism of apparatus through the philosophy of photography. The process of studying the text included close reading individually, taking notes, making synopses, discussions, group readings, making a mind map, commenting and sharing our notes etc. During the process, as certain questions opened up, we chose additional texts:
	*Giorgio Agamben: ''What is an Apparatus?''		*'''Giorgio Agamben: ''What is an Apparatus?''
	*Sean Dorrance Kelly: ''A philosopher argues that an AI can't be an artist'' (an article)		*Sean Dorrance Kelly: ''A philosopher argues that an AI can't be an artist'' (an article)'''

	The final reader will probably encompass a selection of quotes from examined texts, with our own comments, synopses, questions and conclusions. The final form is yet to be defined, since it depends largely on the content we will select from all the material.		Since the final reader is still in development, we might add other texts if necessary.

			4. The final reader will probably encompass a selection of quotes from examined texts, with our own comments, synopses, questions and conclusions. The final form is yet to be defined, since it depends largely on the content we will select from all the material.
	Few keywords for the final form:		Few keywords for the final form:
	*book		*book
Line 18:		Line 20:
	*user's guide		*user's guide

	~~Since the final reader is still in development, we might add other texts if necessary~~.		5. The methods we used for studying the texts were diverse, however, they all seem to tie together towards the final reader. First, we individually took notes and/or made synopses of book's chapters. To find a common space for our thoughts and to be able to visualise connections between them, we used Milanote [https://app.milanote.com/1H43Rb1rxp429N BOARD] which allows us to add notes, texts, images, comments and organise the content. After reading the whole text, each of us chose a specific domain of interest and concentrated on it. This resulted in subtopics temporarily named Photographic Universe, The Apparatus, Information, Subverting the Program and Image. This workspace was convenient for sharing and freely adding content, however, at some point we realised that our content overgrew the form and became disorderly. To be able to translate it into a final reader, we decided to convert it into a (rather linear) form of text aka Word document.
	The methods we used for studying the texts were diverse, however, they all seem to tie together towards the final reader. First, we individually took notes and/or made synopses of book's chapters. To find a common space for our thoughts and to be able to visualise connections between them, we used Milanote [https://app.milanote.com/1H43Rb1rxp429N BOARD] which allows us to add notes, texts, images, comments and organise the content. After reading the whole text, each of us chose a specific domain of interest and concentrated on it. This resulted in subtopics temporarily named Photographic Universe, The Apparatus, Information, Subverting the Program and Image. This workspace was convenient for sharing and freely adding content, however, at some point we realised that our content overgrew the form and became disorderly. To be able to translate it into a final reader, we decided to convert it into a (rather linear) form of text aka Word document.

	=the group (participants & interests)=		=the group (participants & interests)=

Mia: /* The annotated reader */

2019-03-30T10:20:16Z

The annotated reader

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 =The annotated reader=
-[[Calendars:Networked_Media_Calendar/Networked_Media_Calendar/20-03-2019_-Event_1|Link to the RW&RM session in wiki calendar]]
+. [[Calendars:Networked_Media_Calendar/Networked_Media_Calendar/20-03-2019_-Event_1|Link to the RW&RM session in wiki calendar]]
-''The annotated reader'' is
+. ''The annotated reader'' is an approach to theoretical texts we find relevant or interesting (possibly in relation to our own practices). First the class divided in three groups each defined by a core text or domain of interest. We conduct this process of research for several weeks, aiming at an 'annotated reader' as a final result.
 =the group (participants & interests)=

Mia at 09:43, 30 March 2019

2019-03-30T09:43:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:43, 30 March 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
			=The annotated reader=
			[[Calendars:Networked_Media_Calendar/Networked_Media_Calendar/20-03-2019_-Event_1\|Link to the RW&RM session in wiki calendar]]

			''The annotated reader'' is

	=the group (participants & interests)=		=the group (participants & interests)=
	Group 1: Cemal, Mia, Felix, Andreas, Sonia		Group 1: Cemal, Mia, Felix, Andreas, Sonia

Mia: /* Suggested Readings */

2019-03-20T12:15:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:15, 20 March 2019
Line 41:		Line 41:
	'''IMAGES "WITHOUT AN AUTHOR"		'''IMAGES "WITHOUT AN AUTHOR"
	'''On AI as artist (not sure if relevant, still need to read it), Sean Dorrance Kelly (Harvard): https://www.technologyreview.com/s/612913/a-philosopher-argues-that-an-ai-can-never-be-an-artist/'''		'''On AI as artist (not sure if relevant, still need to read it), Sean Dorrance Kelly (Harvard): https://www.technologyreview.com/s/612913/a-philosopher-argues-that-an-ai-can-never-be-an-artist/'''

			more on image: Hans Belting: An Anthropology of Images - http://layoftheland.net/archive/art3959c/readings/out.pdf

	=What are the core interests of the group?=		=What are the core interests of the group?=