Jujube/pixels - Revision history

Jujube at 12:19, 18 November 2018

2018-11-18T12:19:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:19, 18 November 2018
Line 16:		Line 16:
	Is there too much fictional sharpness around us?		Is there too much fictional sharpness around us?

	~~(There will be~~ a ~~seminar with Javi about~~ resolution on 12/11.[http://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/Calendars:Networked_Media_Calendar/Networked_Media_Calendar/12-11-2018_-Event_4])		Javi gave a lecture on resolution, glitch and the Poor Image on 12/11. See http://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/Calendars:Networked_Media_Calendar/Networked_Media_Calendar/12-11-2018_-Event_4)

Jujube at 12:18, 18 November 2018

2018-11-18T12:18:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:18, 18 November 2018
Line 16:		Line 16:
	Is there too much fictional sharpness around us?		Is there too much fictional sharpness around us?

	(There will be a seminar with Javi about resolution on 12/11.[~~https~~://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/Calendars:Networked_Media_Calendar/Networked_Media_Calendar/12-11-2018_-Event_4])		(There will be a seminar with Javi about resolution on 12/11.[http://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/Calendars:Networked_Media_Calendar/Networked_Media_Calendar/12-11-2018_-Event_4])


	== Image as Data ==		== Image as Data ==

Jujube at 21:05, 9 October 2018

2018-10-09T21:05:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:05, 9 October 2018
Line 56:		Line 56:

	{{youtube\|4I5Q3UXkGd0}}		{{youtube\|4I5Q3UXkGd0}}

			--> 5:21 <--

			576 megapixels (A megapixel is made up of one million individual pixels) not considering other factors such as fovea

	''Not only do we not visually revolve the world like in a camera, we also don't narratively resolve the conflict and drama in our life like in the movie scripts.''		''Not only do we not visually revolve the world like in a camera, we also don't narratively resolve the conflict and drama in our life like in the movie scripts.''

Jujube at 20:31, 9 October 2018

2018-10-09T20:31:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:31, 9 October 2018
Line 49:		Line 49:
	''Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one photosite(pixel) to the center of the next. The larger the photosite, the more light it can capture and the more information can be recorded. Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one square cm of the sensor.''[https://www.digicamdb.com/specs/canon_eos-5d-mark-iii/]		''Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one photosite(pixel) to the center of the next. The larger the photosite, the more light it can capture and the more information can be recorded. Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one square cm of the sensor.''[https://www.digicamdb.com/specs/canon_eos-5d-mark-iii/]

	== ~~Image Quality~~ ==		== Delivery/Display ==

	~~something~~		If a movie is shot with 4k resolution and only projected at 2k (which, according to Barend, is still the standard in NL), then why do we need all the pixels?

	~~== Display ==~~

	~~something~~

	== The Resolution of the Eyes ==		== The Resolution of the Eyes ==

Jujube at 08:56, 3 October 2018

2018-10-03T08:56:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:56, 3 October 2018
Line 57:		Line 57:
	something		something

			== The Resolution of the Eyes ==

			{{youtube\|4I5Q3UXkGd0}}

			''Not only do we not visually revolve the world like in a camera, we also don't narratively resolve the conflict and drama in our life like in the movie scripts.''

	== What Are Screens doing to Us ==		== What Are Screens doing to Us ==

	https://www.wired.com/story/failing-vision-screens-blindness/?mbid=nl_daily_welcome		https://www.wired.com/story/failing-vision-screens-blindness/?mbid=nl_daily_welcome

Jujube at 08:43, 23 September 2018

2018-09-23T08:43:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:43, 23 September 2018
Line 15:		Line 15:

	Is there too much fictional sharpness around us?		Is there too much fictional sharpness around us?

			(There will be a seminar with Javi about resolution on 12/11.[https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/Calendars:Networked_Media_Calendar/Networked_Media_Calendar/12-11-2018_-Event_4])

	== Image as Data ==		== Image as Data ==

Jujube at 19:29, 22 September 2018

2018-09-22T19:29:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:29, 22 September 2018
Line 12:		Line 12:
	Below is an investigation on #2 and the relationship between #2 and #3, focused on digital production and dissemination.		Below is an investigation on #2 and the relationship between #2 and #3, focused on digital production and dissemination.

	I am writing it out ~~simply~~ because I sense a data inflation among all the screens that surround us, and I'd like to do some calculations to prove my hypothesis.		I am writing it out because I sense a data inflation among all the screens that surround us, and I'd like to do some calculations to prove my hypothesis:

			Is there too much fictional sharpness around us?

	== Image as Data ==		== Image as Data ==
Line 21:		Line 23:
	# the image quality (a setting on the camera) regulates the actual data stored		# the image quality (a setting on the camera) regulates the actual data stored
	# the display/physical medium that outputs the image (to be perceived by a human)		# the display/physical medium that outputs the image (to be perceived by a human)

			The human eyes receive the output. That's the beginning of seeing/perceiving.

	A digital Input to a digital Output interests me the most because of its potential to show how the sharpness we think we are seeing might be something quite simple. We might be able to rethink about sharpness and the tools we use to produce it.		A digital Input to a digital Output interests me the most because of its potential to show how the sharpness we think we are seeing might be something quite simple. We might be able to rethink about sharpness and the tools we use to produce it.

Jujube at 19:25, 22 September 2018

2018-09-22T19:25:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:25, 22 September 2018
Line 6:		Line 6:
	But what do we really mean by sharp?		But what do we really mean by sharp?

	There is sharpness at the focal point, which requires understanding of the mechanisms of photography. ~~Think~~ the exposure triangle (or tricycle, as some refer to it)[https://photo.stackexchange.com/questions/6598/what-is-the-exposure-triangle].		# There is sharpness at the focal point, which requires understanding of the mechanisms of photography. Eg. the exposure triangle (or tricycle, as some refer to it)[https://photo.stackexchange.com/questions/6598/what-is-the-exposure-triangle]
			# There is sharpness by display. Eg. retina display.
			# Then there is sharpness by perception.

	~~There is sharpness by display. Think retina display.~~		Below is an investigation on #2 and the relationship between #2 and #3, focused on digital production and dissemination.

	~~Then there is sharpness by perception.~~

	Below is an investigation on the ~~last~~, focused on digital production and dissemination.

	I am writing it out simply because I sense a data inflation among all the screens that surround us, and I'd like to do some calculations to prove my hypothesis.		I am writing it out simply because I sense a data inflation among all the screens that surround us, and I'd like to do some calculations to prove my hypothesis.
Line 52:		Line 50:

	something		something

			== What Are Screens doing to Us ==

			https://www.wired.com/story/failing-vision-screens-blindness/?mbid=nl_daily_welcome

Jujube at 20:28, 19 September 2018

2018-09-19T20:28:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:28, 19 September 2018
Line 8:		Line 8:
	There is sharpness at the focal point, which requires understanding of the mechanisms of photography. Think the exposure triangle (or tricycle, as some refer to it)[https://photo.stackexchange.com/questions/6598/what-is-the-exposure-triangle].		There is sharpness at the focal point, which requires understanding of the mechanisms of photography. Think the exposure triangle (or tricycle, as some refer to it)[https://photo.stackexchange.com/questions/6598/what-is-the-exposure-triangle].

	~~Then there~~ is sharpness by ~~perception~~. Think retina display.		There is sharpness by display. Think retina display.

	Below is an investigation on the ~~latter~~, focused on ~~the~~ digital ~~(both in~~ production and in dissemination).		Then there is sharpness by perception.

			Below is an investigation on the last, focused on digital production and dissemination.

	I am writing it out simply because I sense a data inflation among all the screens that surround us, and I'd like to do some calculations to prove my hypothesis.		I am writing it out simply because I sense a data inflation among all the screens that surround us, and I'd like to do some calculations to prove my hypothesis.
Line 22:		Line 24:
	# the display/physical medium that outputs the image (to be perceived by a human)		# the display/physical medium that outputs the image (to be perceived by a human)

	A digital Input to a digital Output interests me the most because of its potential to show how the sharpness we think we are seeing ~~is not what we actually see. What we actually see is probably simpler..~~. We might be able to rethink about sharpness and the tools we use to produce it.		A digital Input to a digital Output interests me the most because of its potential to show how the sharpness we think we are seeing might be something quite simple. We might be able to rethink about sharpness and the tools we use to produce it.

	== Photosensor ==		== Photosensor ==

Jujube at 20:25, 19 September 2018

2018-09-19T20:25:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:25, 19 September 2018
Line 22:		Line 22:
	# the display/physical medium that outputs the image (to be perceived by a human)		# the display/physical medium that outputs the image (to be perceived by a human)

	A digital Input to a digital Output interests me the most because of its potential to show how the sharpness we think we are seeing is not what we actually see. What we actually see is probably simpler... We might be able to rethink about sharpness and ~~whether~~ it ~~matters at all~~.		A digital Input to a digital Output interests me the most because of its potential to show how the sharpness we think we are seeing is not what we actually see. What we actually see is probably simpler... We might be able to rethink about sharpness and the tools we use to produce it.

	== Photosensor ==		== Photosensor ==