Jujube/methods-research-group - Revision history

Jujube: /* >>The Promise of Touch: Turns to Affect in Feminist Film Theory - Anu Koivunen (not by Mulvey, but in the book of Feminisms) */

2019-07-09T16:21:04Z

>>The Promise of Touch: Turns to Affect in Feminist Film Theory - Anu Koivunen (not by Mulvey, but in the book of Feminisms)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:21, 9 July 2019
Line 172:		Line 172:
	The classical understanding of the oppression of the 70's is "women as spectacle". However, Mulvey provides another account that does not follow the somewhat overused rhetoric.She analyzes early Hollywood cinema next to post-revolutionary Iranian cinema. While the former has played a role in the popularization of glamour in 1920's and all sorts of theories around gaze and fetish, "erotic femininity was signified by its erasure" in the latter. Both cinemas speak to troublesome image creation and the ideology associated with it.		The classical understanding of the oppression of the 70's is "women as spectacle". However, Mulvey provides another account that does not follow the somewhat overused rhetoric.She analyzes early Hollywood cinema next to post-revolutionary Iranian cinema. While the former has played a role in the popularization of glamour in 1920's and all sorts of theories around gaze and fetish, "erotic femininity was signified by its erasure" in the latter. Both cinemas speak to troublesome image creation and the ideology associated with it.

	== >>The Promise of Touch: Turns to Affect in Feminist Film Theory - Anu Koivunen (not by Mulvey, but in the book of Feminisms) ==		== The Promise of Touch: Turns to Affect in Feminist Film Theory - Anu Koivunen (not by Mulvey, but in the book of Feminisms) ==

			notes only

			phenomenology & new materialism (Deleuzian) <-- e.g. haptic visuality by Laura Marks, intersubjectivity, not alienated spectatorship

			--- epistomologic fault line ---

			the psychoanalytic, Marxist, Perician (Lacanian) frameworks <-- Mulvey was situated here in 1975

	= my positions as I read Mulvey=		= my positions as I read Mulvey=

Jujube: /* >> Introduction : 1970's Feminist Film Theory and the Obsolescent Object */

2019-07-09T16:16:44Z

>> Introduction : 1970's Feminist Film Theory and the Obsolescent Object

@@ Line 158: / Line 158: @@
 This essay is included in ''The Cinematic.'' See synopsis --> [[Jujube/methods-session-3#Laura_Mulvey:_Stillness_in_the_Moving_Image.2C_2003]]
-== >> Introduction : 1970's Feminist Film Theory and the Obsolescent Object ==
+== Introduction : 1970's Feminist Film Theory and the Obsolescent Object ==
 == >>The Promise of Touch: Turns to Affect in Feminist Film Theory - Anu Koivunen (not by Mulvey, but in the book of Feminisms) ==

Jujube: /* June 2019 */

2019-06-04T10:17:03Z

June 2019

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:17, 4 June 2019
Line 40:		Line 40:
	== '''June 2019''' ==		== '''June 2019''' ==

	What evokes and conveys emotion? How to?		Always: What evokes and conveys emotion? How to?

	In the past: storytelling (through writing, especially drama)		In the past: storytelling through writing, especially drama

	Now: aesthetics of the image... BUT HOW?		Now: aesthetics of the image... BUT HOW?
Line 51:		Line 51:

	-- What I understand better: medium, space (in particular to the medium), craft, my own voice in image-making (it's hard)		-- What I understand better: medium, space (in particular to the medium), craft, my own voice in image-making (it's hard)

			'''Current keywords: memory image, identification (part of empathy), projection, cinema space, cinematography'''

	I find theoretical essays relating to '''haptic aesthetics''' less relevant than the design research or scientific studies. For example, ''Haptical Cinema'', in which the author compares early cinema to Egyptian reliefs, is less interesting to read than ''An audio-haptic aesthetic framework influenced by visual theory''. [http://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/Jujube/methods-session-3a#An_audio-haptic_aesthetic_framework_influenced_by_visual_theory]		I find theoretical essays relating to '''haptic aesthetics''' less relevant than the design research or scientific studies. For example, ''Haptical Cinema'', in which the author compares early cinema to Egyptian reliefs, is less interesting to read than ''An audio-haptic aesthetic framework influenced by visual theory''. [http://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/Jujube/methods-session-3a#An_audio-haptic_aesthetic_framework_influenced_by_visual_theory]

Jujube at 10:14, 4 June 2019

2019-06-04T10:14:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:14, 4 June 2019
Line 3:		Line 3:

	= research group + own research =		= research group + own research =

	~~== group information ==~~

	[[Research-group-sjm]]		[[Research-group-sjm]]
Line 10:		Line 8:
	Susanna, Jue, Marieke		Susanna, Jue, Marieke

	Keywords: affect, gaze and gender		Keywords: affect, gaze and gender (as of March 2019)

	== How is my research related to this research group? ==		== How is my research related to this research group? ==
Line 40:		Line 38:
	I have selected my readings directing towards the specificity of the techniques and studies of cinema, including haptic aesthetics and screen as a situation.		I have selected my readings directing towards the specificity of the techniques and studies of cinema, including haptic aesthetics and screen as a situation.

	'''June 2019'''		== '''June 2019''' ==

	What evokes and conveys emotion? How to?		What evokes and conveys emotion? How to?
Line 73:		Line 71:
	*Cinematography: The Creative Use of Reality		*Cinematography: The Creative Use of Reality

	These, along with the 16mm workshop we did at Filmwerkplatz and the earlier classes we had on the history of camera technology with Mathijs/Barend, helped me to further position the use of camera and the use of documentary in my practice ~~-->~~ I am using digital camera and I choose conservative settings (aka. best practice) when I shoot documentary footage. (This might change as I further my practice, but I'd like to start with the norms and really understand them.)		These, along with the 16mm workshop we did at Filmwerkplatz and the earlier classes we had on the history of camera technology with Mathijs/Barend, helped me to further position the use of camera and the use of documentary in my practice. '''I am using digital camera and I choose conservative settings (aka. best practice) when I shoot documentary footage. (This might change as I further my practice, but I'd like to start with the norms and really understand them.)'''

	I have since bought the ''Documentary'' title from Whitechapel (after having a hard time to choose among: ''The Everyday'', ''Moving Image'', etc.)		I have since bought the ''Documentary'' title from Whitechapel (after having a hard time to choose among: ''The Everyday'', ''Moving Image'', etc.)

Jujube: /* What am I reading now? */

2019-06-04T10:12:18Z

What am I reading now?

@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
 == What am I reading now? ==
 My interest in cinematography emerges, somewhat coincidentally, with ''The Cinematic'' readings and a work I created over December 2018 to Feb 2019 (''Seek''). [http://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/Jujube/methods-session-5#The_roles_of_theory_and_story_in_my_work:_how_I_made_Seek_.28ESSAY_IN_PROGRESS.29]
 I have selected my readings directing towards the specificity of the techniques and studies of cinema, including haptic aesthetics and screen as a situation.
 = reading Mulvey =

Jujube at 08:24, 4 June 2019

2019-06-04T08:24:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:24, 4 June 2019
Line 120:		Line 120:

	== >> Introduction : 1970's Feminist Film Theory and the Obsolescent Object ==		== >> Introduction : 1970's Feminist Film Theory and the Obsolescent Object ==

			== >>The Promise of Touch: Turns to Affect in Feminist Film Theory - Anu Koivunen (not by Mulvey, but in the book of Feminisms) ==

	= my positions as I read Mulvey=		= my positions as I read Mulvey=
Line 130:		Line 132:

	- I will keep reading academic writing as long as it helps me build connections among different knowledge systems OR gives me new insight about something, however esoteric, relevant. I will set the tone of my research in an academic language. I am a conscientious about the roles of theories in my practice and do not take any theoretical text for granted without the historical and cultural context in mind.		- I will keep reading academic writing as long as it helps me build connections among different knowledge systems OR gives me new insight about something, however esoteric, relevant. I will set the tone of my research in an academic language. I am a conscientious about the roles of theories in my practice and do not take any theoretical text for granted without the historical and cultural context in mind.

	~~= feminisms (relevance/perspectives on my own research) =~~

	~~== >> The Promise of Touch: Turns to Affect in Feminist Film Theory - Anu Koivunen ==~~

	= reading text suggested by Marieke and Susanna =		= reading text suggested by Marieke and Susanna =

Jujube: /* feminisms (relevance/perspectives on my own research) */

2019-05-28T15:43:42Z

feminisms (relevance/perspectives on my own research)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:43, 28 May 2019
Line 133:		Line 133:
	= feminisms (relevance/perspectives on my own research) =		= feminisms (relevance/perspectives on my own research) =

	The Promise of Touch: Turns to Affect in Feminist Film Theory - Anu Koivunen+		== >> The Promise of Touch: Turns to Affect in Feminist Film Theory - Anu Koivunen ==

	= reading text suggested by Marieke and Susanna =		= reading text suggested by Marieke and Susanna =

Jujube: /* Introduction : 1970's Feminist Film Theory and the Obsolescent Object */

2019-05-28T15:43:15Z

Introduction : 1970's Feminist Film Theory and the Obsolescent Object

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:43, 28 May 2019
Line 119:		Line 119:
	This essay is included in ''The Cinematic.'' See synopsis --> [[Jujube/methods-session-3#Laura_Mulvey:_Stillness_in_the_Moving_Image.2C_2003]]		This essay is included in ''The Cinematic.'' See synopsis --> [[Jujube/methods-session-3#Laura_Mulvey:_Stillness_in_the_Moving_Image.2C_2003]]

	== Introduction : 1970's Feminist Film Theory and the Obsolescent Object ==		== >> Introduction : 1970's Feminist Film Theory and the Obsolescent Object ==

	= my positions as I read Mulvey=		= my positions as I read Mulvey=

Jujube at 11:17, 29 April 2019

2019-04-29T11:17:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:17, 29 April 2019
Line 131:		Line 131:
	- I will keep reading academic writing as long as it helps me build connections among different knowledge systems OR gives me new insight about something, however esoteric, relevant. I will set the tone of my research in an academic language. I am a conscientious about the roles of theories in my practice and do not take any theoretical text for granted without the historical and cultural context in mind.		- I will keep reading academic writing as long as it helps me build connections among different knowledge systems OR gives me new insight about something, however esoteric, relevant. I will set the tone of my research in an academic language. I am a conscientious about the roles of theories in my practice and do not take any theoretical text for granted without the historical and cultural context in mind.

	= feminisms =		= feminisms (relevance/perspectives on my own research) =

	~~I read these to contextualize Mulvey's early texts.~~

	~~Introduction: 1970s Feminist Film Theory and the Obsolescent Object - Laura Mulvey+~~
	The Promise of Touch: Turns to Affect in Feminist Film Theory - Anu Koivunen+		The Promise of Touch: Turns to Affect in Feminist Film Theory - Anu Koivunen+

Jujube at 11:16, 29 April 2019

2019-04-29T11:16:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:16, 29 April 2019
Line 130:		Line 130:

	- I will keep reading academic writing as long as it helps me build connections among different knowledge systems OR gives me new insight about something, however esoteric, relevant. I will set the tone of my research in an academic language. I am a conscientious about the roles of theories in my practice and do not take any theoretical text for granted without the historical and cultural context in mind.		- I will keep reading academic writing as long as it helps me build connections among different knowledge systems OR gives me new insight about something, however esoteric, relevant. I will set the tone of my research in an academic language. I am a conscientious about the roles of theories in my practice and do not take any theoretical text for granted without the historical and cultural context in mind.

			= feminisms =

			I read these to contextualize Mulvey's early texts.

			Introduction: 1970s Feminist Film Theory and the Obsolescent Object - Laura Mulvey+
			The Promise of Touch: Turns to Affect in Feminist Film Theory - Anu Koivunen+

	= reading text suggested by Marieke and Susanna =		= reading text suggested by Marieke and Susanna =