Andreas Project Proposal Draft 3 - Revision history

Steve Rushton at 11:12, 27 November 2019

2019-11-27T11:12:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:12, 27 November 2019
Line 2:		Line 2:

	==What do you want to make?==		==What do you want to make?==

			[[AndreasSteveFeedbackonProposal]]

	'''I want to make a visual essay that features interviews from professionals''' <small>(in the field of psychology and sociology)</small> '''and my observations''' <small>(I am aware that these may be subjective and sometimes abstract)</small> '''on the topic of brevity.'''		'''I want to make a visual essay that features interviews from professionals''' <small>(in the field of psychology and sociology)</small> '''and my observations''' <small>(I am aware that these may be subjective and sometimes abstract)</small> '''on the topic of brevity.'''

Steve Rushton: /* What do you want to make? */

2019-11-21T13:24:20Z

What do you want to make?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:24, 21 November 2019
Line 9:		Line 9:
	If I want to bring the brevity discourse to the moving image, the film has to be what the narrator was in the Roman age. With a film in a cinema the movie is carrying the same kind of responsibility that the narrator was (or still is) carrying.		If I want to bring the brevity discourse to the moving image, the film has to be what the narrator was in the Roman age. With a film in a cinema the movie is carrying the same kind of responsibility that the narrator was (or still is) carrying.

	(An installation would not guarantee that the viewer would watch the work from start to end. It would be very likely that the audience would walk in and out in the middle of the film instead of watching it as a whole. However, I have to admit that it would also be an interesting task to keep the viewer informed and interested throughout the whole time – if it were a installation piece.)		(An installation would not guarantee that the viewer would watch the work from start to end. It would be very likely that the audience would walk in and out in the middle of the film instead of watching it as a whole. However, I have to admit that it would also be an interesting task to keep the viewer informed and interested throughout the whole time – if it were a installation piece.) [<<you do not need to go into detail about what it is NOT...]

	==How do you plan to make it?==		==How do you plan to make it?==

Steve Rushton: /* What do you want to make? */

2019-11-21T13:23:15Z

What do you want to make?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:23, 21 November 2019
Line 5:		Line 5:
	'''I want to make a visual essay that features interviews from professionals''' <small>(in the field of psychology and sociology)</small> '''and my observations''' <small>(I am aware that these may be subjective and sometimes abstract)</small> '''on the topic of brevity.'''		'''I want to make a visual essay that features interviews from professionals''' <small>(in the field of psychology and sociology)</small> '''and my observations''' <small>(I am aware that these may be subjective and sometimes abstract)</small> '''on the topic of brevity.'''

			[ what is 'the brevity discourse'? here outline what is at stake, for you what do you want the piece to be about what key topics do you want to discuss or cover?]

	If I want to bring the brevity discourse to the moving image, the film has to be what the narrator was in the Roman age. With a film in a cinema the movie is carrying the same kind of responsibility that the narrator was (or still is) carrying.		If I want to bring the brevity discourse to the moving image, the film has to be what the narrator was in the Roman age. With a film in a cinema the movie is carrying the same kind of responsibility that the narrator was (or still is) carrying.

Andreas: /* Relation to a larger context */

2019-11-13T23:30:32Z

Relation to a larger context

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:30, 14 November 2019
Line 107:		Line 107:
	Kenneth Goldsmith is setting up an interesting hypothesis: he is claiming, that people do not read less in overall, but the omnipresence of digital media is causing the opposite. He is stating that daily news, Facebook statuses or the fast Twitter notification on the smartphones are making everyone read more, like no print medium would have been able to. That is why the amount of reading would have even increased; only the way of reading has changed. (Goldsmith, 2016, p. 4)		Kenneth Goldsmith is setting up an interesting hypothesis: he is claiming, that people do not read less in overall, but the omnipresence of digital media is causing the opposite. He is stating that daily news, Facebook statuses or the fast Twitter notification on the smartphones are making everyone read more, like no print medium would have been able to. That is why the amount of reading would have even increased; only the way of reading has changed. (Goldsmith, 2016, p. 4)

	In the meantime even carriers of important positions are using just 140 characters to send out information of big scope. Donald Trump was therefore even called ''the master of simplification''. Are these messages therefore more authentic? Closer to the person? Or does it instead just reveal a polarization, that has been less visible before? By using short statements one can react often and quick. But quantity has the tendency to cover quality.		In the meantime even carriers of important positions are using just 140 characters to send out information of big scope. Donald Trump was therefore even called ''the master of simplification''. Are these messages therefore more authentic? Closer to the person? Or does it instead just reveal a polarization, that has been less visible before? By using short statements one can react often and quick. But quantity has the tendency to cover quality. (Jäger, 2018)

	Even in the scientific communication a row of new forms of mediation have been introduced: in addition to ''classic'' publications like books or magazine articles, blogs and social media are appearing. Evening-lectures are being expanded to Science-Slams, Pecha Kucha-nights or FameLabs. Conferences are increasingly using sharing-concepts and participative formats like fishbowls, roundtables or barcamps. Which formats can scientists, in the sense of serious mediation, be taken responsible for? Isn't scientific content too complex, to be displayed in just 140 (or even 280) characters, in ten minutes or six pictures? Or is science loosing public relevance if it is refusing the demand on brevity and participation? (Jäger, 2018)

	== References ==		== References ==

Andreas: /* What do you want to make? */

2019-11-13T23:07:40Z

What do you want to make?

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:07, 14 November 2019
Line 8:		Line 8:
	If I want to bring the brevity discourse to the moving image, the film has to be what the narrator was in the Roman age. With a film in a cinema the movie is carrying the same kind of responsibility that the narrator was (or still is) carrying.		If I want to bring the brevity discourse to the moving image, the film has to be what the narrator was in the Roman age. With a film in a cinema the movie is carrying the same kind of responsibility that the narrator was (or still is) carrying.

	(An installation would not guarantee that the viewer would watch the work from start to end. It would be very likely that the audience would walk in and out in the middle of the film instead of watching it as a whole. However, I have to admit that it would be an interesting task to keep the viewer informed and interested throughout the whole time – if it were a installation piece.)		(An installation would not guarantee that the viewer would watch the work from start to end. It would be very likely that the audience would walk in and out in the middle of the film instead of watching it as a whole. However, I have to admit that it would also be an interesting task to keep the viewer informed and interested throughout the whole time – if it were a installation piece.)

	==How do you plan to make it?==		==How do you plan to make it?==

Andreas: /* Relation to a larger context */

2019-11-13T23:05:27Z

Relation to a larger context

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:05, 14 November 2019
Line 109:		Line 109:
	In the meantime even carriers of important positions are using just 140 characters to send out information of big scope. Donald Trump was therefore even called ''the master of simplification''. Are these messages therefore more authentic? Closer to the person? Or does it instead just reveal a polarization, that has been less visible before? By using short statements one can react often and quick. But quantity has the tendency to cover quality.		In the meantime even carriers of important positions are using just 140 characters to send out information of big scope. Donald Trump was therefore even called ''the master of simplification''. Are these messages therefore more authentic? Closer to the person? Or does it instead just reveal a polarization, that has been less visible before? By using short statements one can react often and quick. But quantity has the tendency to cover quality.

	Even in the scientific communication a row of new forms of mediation have been introduced: in addition to ''classic'' publications like books or magazine articles, blogs and social media are appearing. Evening-lectures are being expanded to Science-Slams, Pecha Kucha-nights or FameLabs. Conferences are increasingly using sharing-concepts and participative formats like fishbowls, roundtables or barcamps. Which formats can scientists, in the sense of serious mediation, be taken responsible for? Isn't scientific content too complex, to be displayed in just 140 (or even 280) characters, in ten minutes or six pictures? Or is science loosing public relevance if it is refusing the demand on brevity and participation?		Even in the scientific communication a row of new forms of mediation have been introduced: in addition to ''classic'' publications like books or magazine articles, blogs and social media are appearing. Evening-lectures are being expanded to Science-Slams, Pecha Kucha-nights or FameLabs. Conferences are increasingly using sharing-concepts and participative formats like fishbowls, roundtables or barcamps. Which formats can scientists, in the sense of serious mediation, be taken responsible for? Isn't scientific content too complex, to be displayed in just 140 (or even 280) characters, in ten minutes or six pictures? Or is science loosing public relevance if it is refusing the demand on brevity and participation? (Jäger, 2018)

	== References ==		== References ==

Andreas: /* Who can help you and how? */

2019-11-13T23:03:56Z

Who can help you and how?

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:03, 14 November 2019
Line 87:		Line 87:

	Aside from the tutors who can help me with critical thinking and narrative skills developing, the PZI classmates can always offer excellent ideas for my work.		Aside from the tutors who can help me with critical thinking and narrative skills developing, the PZI classmates can always offer excellent ideas for my work.
	I will reach out to Dr. Maren Jäger (who is a Postdoctorate at the HU Berlin), Susanne Janssen, Florian Cramer and Kenneth Goldsmith and see if they would be open to be interviewed for my film.		I will reach out for example to Dr. Maren Jäger (who is a Postdoctorate for Literature at the HU Berlin), Susanne Janssen (Graphic Design Graduate of the WdKA 2019), Florian Cramer (Reader in 21st Century Visual Culture/Autonomous Practices) and Kenneth Goldsmith (Poet, Writer and Teacher at the University of Pennsylvania) and see if they would be open to be interviewed for my film.
	On top of that I will be able to borrow equipment from the photo-studio I am working at right now. Since the Academy is very poorly equipped, this is a substantial help on getting cameras and lenses.		On top of that I will be able to borrow equipment from the photo-studio I am working at right now. Since the Academy is very poorly equipped, this is a substantial help on getting cameras and lenses.

Andreas: /* References */

2019-11-13T22:56:24Z

References

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:56, 14 November 2019
Line 123:		Line 123:
	JANSSEN, S. (2019) ''Software organism BA Research Project'' [online]. Available at: http://www.susannejanssen.eu/software-organism-ba-research (Accessed: 07 October 2019)		JANSSEN, S. (2019) ''Software organism BA Research Project'' [online]. Available at: http://www.susannejanssen.eu/software-organism-ba-research (Accessed: 07 October 2019)

	JÄGER, M. (2018) ''Kommunikation in der Wissenschaft Kurz und knackig, auf die Zwölf, bitte.'' Deutschlandfunk Nova [online]. Available at: https://www.deutschlandfunknova.de/beitrag/kommunikation-in-der-wissenschaft-kurz-und-knackig (Accessed: 27. ~~January 2018~~)		JÄGER, M. (2018) ''Kommunikation in der Wissenschaft Kurz und knackig, auf die Zwölf, bitte.'' Deutschlandfunk Nova [online]. Available at: https://www.deutschlandfunknova.de/beitrag/kommunikation-in-der-wissenschaft-kurz-und-knackig (Accessed: 27. February 2019)

	ROSA, H. (2016) Beschleunigung und Entfremdung: Entwurf einer kritischen Theorie spätmoderner Zeitlichkeit. 5. Auflage. – Berlin : Suhrkamp		ROSA, H. (2016) Beschleunigung und Entfremdung: Entwurf einer kritischen Theorie spätmoderner Zeitlichkeit. 5. Auflage. – Berlin : Suhrkamp

Andreas: /* References */

2019-11-13T22:55:50Z

References

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:55, 14 November 2019
Line 123:		Line 123:
	JANSSEN, S. (2019) ''Software organism BA Research Project'' [online]. Available at: http://www.susannejanssen.eu/software-organism-ba-research (Accessed: 07 October 2019)		JANSSEN, S. (2019) ''Software organism BA Research Project'' [online]. Available at: http://www.susannejanssen.eu/software-organism-ba-research (Accessed: 07 October 2019)

	ROSA, ~~Hartmut~~. (2016) Beschleunigung und Entfremdung: Entwurf einer kritischen Theorie spätmoderner Zeitlichkeit. 5. Auflage. – Berlin : Suhrkamp		JÄGER, M. (2018) ''Kommunikation in der Wissenschaft Kurz und knackig, auf die Zwölf, bitte.'' Deutschlandfunk Nova [online]. Available at: https://www.deutschlandfunknova.de/beitrag/kommunikation-in-der-wissenschaft-kurz-und-knackig (Accessed: 27. January 2018)

			ROSA, H. (2016) Beschleunigung und Entfremdung: Entwurf einer kritischen Theorie spätmoderner Zeitlichkeit. 5. Auflage. – Berlin : Suhrkamp

	== Sketches ==		== Sketches ==

Andreas: /* Who can help you and how? */

2019-11-13T16:33:49Z

Who can help you and how?

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:33, 13 November 2019
Line 87:		Line 87:

	Aside from the tutors who can help me with critical thinking and narrative skills developing, the PZI classmates can always offer excellent ideas for my work.		Aside from the tutors who can help me with critical thinking and narrative skills developing, the PZI classmates can always offer excellent ideas for my work.
	I will reach out to Susanne Janssen, Florian Cramer and Kenneth Goldsmith and see if they would be open to be interviewed for my film.		I will reach out to Dr. Maren Jäger (who is a Postdoctorate at the HU Berlin), Susanne Janssen, Florian Cramer and Kenneth Goldsmith and see if they would be open to be interviewed for my film.
	On top of that I will be able to borrow equipment from the photo-studio I am working at right now. Since the Academy is very poorly equipped, this is a substantial help on getting cameras and lenses.		On top of that I will be able to borrow equipment from the photo-studio I am working at right now. Since the Academy is very poorly equipped, this is a substantial help on getting cameras and lenses.